scholarly journals Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection compared with RT-PCR assay for emerging variants at a high-throughput community testing site in Taiwan

Author(s):  
Ming-Jr Jian ◽  
Cherng-Lih Perng ◽  
Hsing-Yi Chung ◽  
Chih-Kai Chang ◽  
Jung-Chung Lin ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 17496-17504 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Y. Mu ◽  
A.Y. Wang ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
L. Zhao ◽  
Z. Li
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 101575
Author(s):  
Min Zheng ◽  
Xiuqin Chen ◽  
Shao Wang ◽  
Jingxiang Wang ◽  
Meiqing Huang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 101489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Lin ◽  
Shizhong Zhang ◽  
Shao Wang ◽  
Kaichun Xie ◽  
Dandan Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 8-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingfang Chen ◽  
Rusheng Zhang ◽  
Xinhua Ou ◽  
Dong Yao ◽  
Zheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketki Jawade ◽  
Akhauri Yash Sinha ◽  
Sharad Bhagat ◽  
Shilpa Bhowmick ◽  
Bhagyashree Chauhan ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackgroundIndia bears the second largest burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A multitude of RT-PCR detection assays with disparate gene targets including automated high throughput platforms are available. Varying concordance and interpretation of diagnostic results in this setting can result in significant reporting delays leading to suboptimal disease management. Here, we report the development of a novel ORF-1a based SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, Viroselect, showing high concordance with conventional assays and the ability to resolve inconclusive results generated during the peak of the epidemic in Mumbai, India.MethodsWe identified a unique target region within SARS-CoV-2 ORF1a, non-structural protein (nsp3), that was used to design and develop our assay. This hypervariable region (1933-3956) between SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-COV was utilized to design our primers and probe for RT-PCR assay. We further evaluated concordance of our assay with commonly used EUA (USFDA) manual kits as well as an automated high throughput testing platform. Further, a retrospective analysis using Viroselect on samples reported as ‘inconclusive’ during April-October 2020 was carried out.ResultsA total of 701 samples were tested. Concordance analysis of 477 samples demonstrated high overall agreement of Viroselect assay with both manual (87.6%; 95% CI) as well as automated (84.7%; 95% CI) testing assays. Also, in the retrospective analysis of 224 additional samples reported as ‘inconclusive’, Viroselect was able to resolve 100% (19/19) and 93.7% (192/205) samples which were termed inconclusive by manual and automated high throughput platform respectively.ConclusionWe show that Viroselect had high concordance with conventional assays, both manual and automated, as well as highlight its potential in resolving inconclusive samples.


2017 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Frankel ◽  
Kenn Forberg ◽  
Kelly E. Coller ◽  
Michael G. Berg ◽  
John Hackett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nira R. Pollock ◽  
Jesica R. Jacobs ◽  
Kristine Tran ◽  
Amber Cranston ◽  
Sita Smith ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundRapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (Ag) that can be performed at point-of-care (POC) can supplement molecular testing and help mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Deployment of an Ag RDT requires an understanding of its operational and performance characteristics under real-world conditions and in relevant subpopulations. We evaluated the Abbott BinaxNOW™ COVID-19 Ag Card in a high-throughput, drive-through, free community testing site in Massachusetts (MA) using anterior nasal (AN) swab RT-PCR for clinical testing.MethodsIndividuals presenting for molecular testing in two of seven lanes were offered the opportunity to also receive BinaxNOW testing. Dual AN swabs were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic children (≤ 18 years) and adults. BinaxNOW testing was performed in a testing pod with temperature/humidity monitoring. One individual performed testing and official result reporting for each test, but most tests had a second independent reading to assess inter-operator agreement. Positive BinaxNOW results were scored as faint, medium, or strong. Positive BinaxNOW results were reported to patients by phone and they were instructed to isolate pending RT-PCR results. The paired RT-PCR result was the reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations.ResultsOf 2482 participants, 1380 adults and 928 children had paired RT-PCR/BinaxNOW results and complete symptom data. 974/1380 (71%) adults and 829/928 (89%) children were asymptomatic. BinaxNOW had 96.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.0-99.3) sensitivity and 100% (98.6-100.0) specificity in adults within 7 days of symptoms, and 84.6% (65.1-95.6) sensitivity and 100% (94.5-100.0) specificity in children within 7 days of symptoms. Sensitivity and specificity in asymptomatic adults were 70.2% (56.6-81.6) and 99.6% (98.9-99.9), respectively, and in asymptomatic children were 65.4% (55.6-74.4) and 99.0% (98.0-99.6), respectively. By cycle threshold (Ct) value cutoff, sensitivity in all subgroups combined (n=292 RT-PCR-positive individuals) was 99.3% with Ct ≤25, 95.8% with ≤30, and 81.2% with ≤35. Twelve false positive BinaxNOW results (out of 2308 tests) were observed; in all twelve, the test bands were faint but otherwise normal, and were noted by both readers. One invalid BinaxNOW result was identified. Inter-operator agreement (positive versus negative BinaxNOW result) was 100% (n = 2230/2230 double reads). Each operator was able to process 20 RDTs per hour. In a separate set of 30 specimens (from individuals with symptoms ≤7 days) run at temperatures below the manufacturer’s recommended range (46-58.5°F), sensitivity was 66.7% and specificity 95.2%.ConclusionsBinaxNOW had very high specificity in both adults and children and very high sensitivity in newly symptomatic adults. Overall, 95.8% sensitivity was observed with Ct ≤ 30. These data support public health recommendations for use of the BinaxNOW test in adults with symptoms for ≤7 days without RT-PCR confirmation. Excellent inter-operator agreement indicates that an individual can perform and read the BinaxNOW test alone. A skilled laboratorian can perform and read 20 tests per hour. Careful attention to temperature is critical.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document