The role of drug susceptibility testing in M/XDR-TB. Too little and too late – Are we doing the right things?

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Erik Hoffner
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1920-1927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Werngren ◽  
Erik Alm ◽  
Mikael Mansjö

ABSTRACTPyrazinamide (PZA) is a key component for the effective treatment of drug-susceptible and PZA-susceptible multidrug-resistant (MDRPZA-S) tuberculosis (TB).pncAgene mutations are usually detected in a clear majority (>90%) of PZA-resistant strains but obviously not in all. Rapid and reliable PZA drug susceptibility testing (DST) is critical whenever PZA is to be used in a treatment regimen, not least for the treatment of MDRPZA-STB. In this study, we selected 26 PZA-resistant isolates reported to carry a wild-typepncAgene. To confirm resistance, susceptibility testing was repeated using 100 mg/liter and 200 mg/liter PZA for all the 26 isolates and Sanger sequencing was repeated on the 18 isolates that remained PZA resistant. Apart from the eight isolates initially misclassified as PZA resistant, the retests identified three factors responsible for the phenotype-genotype discrepancy:panDorrpsAmutations identified by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (n= 7), heteroresistance (n= 8), and mixed populations withMycobacterium avium(n= 3). Additionally, we performed WGS on 400 PZA-susceptible isolates and 15 consecutive MDRPZA-Rclinical isolates. Of the 400 PZA-susceptible isolates, only 1 harbored a nonsynonymouspncAmutation (Thr87Met), whereas a nonsynonymousrpsAmutation was found in 17 isolates. None of these isolates carried a nonsynonymouspanDmutation, while all 15 of the MDRPZA-Risolates harbored a nonsynonymouspncAmutation. Our findings indicate that it is necessary to consider the occurrence ofpanDmutations in PZA-resistant isolates, as well as heteroresistance, for the development and evaluation of new molecular techniques to ensure high-quality DST performance. The identification of nonsynonymousrpsAmutations in both PZA-susceptible and PZA-resistant isolates also implies that further studies are needed in order to determine the role ofrpsAin PZA resistance.


Pathology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 549-553
Author(s):  
Li-Hwei Sng ◽  
Justine Woei Ling Peh ◽  
Melody Tai Lee Kee ◽  
Nurhazirah bte Mohd Ya'akob ◽  
Rick Twee-Hee Ong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Horacio Gil ◽  
Hasmik Margaryan ◽  
Ismailov Azamat ◽  
Bekturdieva Ziba ◽  
Halmuratov Bayram ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
S Acharya ◽  
P Ghimire ◽  
DK Khadka ◽  
S Nepali

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is among the most serious infectious cause of global morbidity and mortality. Emergence of Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is posing an increased threat to TB control programs. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) isolates is important for tackling such problems. Setting: National Tuberculosis Centre (NTC), Thimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Objectives: Comparative evaluation of two in vitro DST methods in determining susceptibility of M. tuberculosis isolates from patients attending NTC, to front-line anti-TB drugs: (Isoniazid-INH, Rifampicin-RFP, Streptomycin-SM, and Ethambutol-EMB). Methodology: This study was conducted from Sep 2006-Jun 2007. A total of 862 sputum samples (diagnosis or follow up cases) collected from patients (type of patients or their categories was not differentiated in this study) attending NTC bacteriology lab for sputum direct smear microscopy were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. All smear positive samples, smear negative samples requested for culture were cultured. All culture positive samples confirmed as M. tuberculosis by biochemical tests were processed for DST by both proportion (PR) and resistance ratio (RR) methods. Results: Out of 862 sputum samples analyzed, 226 (26.2%) samples were positive for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) by fluorescence microscopy. Among 323 samples 226 smear positive samples and 97 smear negative samples requested for culture), 221 (68.4%) were culture positive, 92 (28.5%) were culture negative and 10 (3.1%) were contaminated. Out of 221 isolates of M. tuberculosis, 57.5% were resistant to one or more drugs by the PR method and 56.6% by the RR method. Similarly, MDR isolates were 29.9% and 29% by PR and RR methods respectively. On correlation analysis using Mc Nemar Chi-square test, no significant difference between the two tests were observed (p>0.05). The results showed high agreement between both methods and agreement rates to INH, RFP, SM and EMB were 93.2%, 93.7%, 93.2% and 94.1% respectively. Similarly, the agreement rates between both methods using kappa analysis showed kappa (k) value of 0.86, 0.85, 0.86 and 0.84 for INH, RFP, SM and EMB respectively, which is believed to be good agreement between both methods (k=0.80 to 1.00: Very good agreement). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study showed that both the Proportion and Resistance ratio methods are equally good for determining drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis. Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Drug Susceptibility Testing; Proportion Method; Resistance Ratio Method. DOI: 10.3126/saarctb.v5i1.3078 SAARC J. Tuber. Lung Dis. HIV/AIDS 2008 Vol.5(1) 13-20


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document