Comparison of Proportion and Resistance Ratio Methods for Drug Susceptibility Testing of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> Isolated from Patients Attending National Tuberculosis Centre, Nepal

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is among the most serious infectious cause of global morbidity and mortality. Emergence of Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is posing an increased threat to TB control programs. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) isolates is important for tackling such problems. Setting: National Tuberculosis Centre (NTC), Thimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Objectives: Comparative evaluation of two in vitro DST methods in determining susceptibility of M. tuberculosis isolates from patients attending NTC, to front-line anti-TB drugs: (Isoniazid-INH, Rifampicin-RFP, Streptomycin-SM, and Ethambutol-EMB). Methodology: This study was conducted from Sep 2006-Jun 2007. A total of 862 sputum samples (diagnosis or follow up cases) collected from patients (type of patients or their categories was not differentiated in this study) attending NTC bacteriology lab for sputum direct smear microscopy were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. All smear positive samples, smear negative samples requested for culture were cultured. All culture positive samples confirmed as M. tuberculosis by biochemical tests were processed for DST by both proportion (PR) and resistance ratio (RR) methods. Results: Out of 862 sputum samples analyzed, 226 (26.2%) samples were positive for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) by fluorescence microscopy. Among 323 samples 226 smear positive samples and 97 smear negative samples requested for culture), 221 (68.4%) were culture positive, 92 (28.5%) were culture negative and 10 (3.1%) were contaminated. Out of 221 isolates of M. tuberculosis, 57.5% were resistant to one or more drugs by the PR method and 56.6% by the RR method. Similarly, MDR isolates were 29.9% and 29% by PR and RR methods respectively. On correlation analysis using Mc Nemar Chi-square test, no significant difference between the two tests were observed (p>0.05). The results showed high agreement between both methods and agreement rates to INH, RFP, SM and EMB were 93.2%, 93.7%, 93.2% and 94.1% respectively. Similarly, the agreement rates between both methods using kappa analysis showed kappa (k) value of 0.86, 0.85, 0.86 and 0.84 for INH, RFP, SM and EMB respectively, which is believed to be good agreement between both methods (k=0.80 to 1.00: Very good agreement). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study showed that both the Proportion and Resistance ratio methods are equally good for determining drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis. Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Drug Susceptibility Testing; Proportion Method; Resistance Ratio Method. DOI: 10.3126/saarctb.v5i1.3078 SAARC J. Tuber. Lung Dis. HIV/AIDS 2008 Vol.5(1) 13-20

Download Full-text

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTi m e MTB and RealTi m e MTB INH/RIF Assays for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Resistance Markers in Respiratory and Extrapulmonary Specimens

Journal of Clinical Microbiology ◽

10.1128/jcm.01144-16 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 54 (12) ◽

pp. 3022-3027 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Sabine Hofmann-Thiel ◽

Nikolay Molodtsov ◽

Uladzimir Antonenka ◽

Harald Hoffmann

Keyword(s):

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽

Susceptibility Testing ◽

Drug Susceptibility ◽

Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽

Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽

Content Type ◽

Clinical Specimens ◽

Different Types ◽

Resistance Markers ◽

Smear Negative

The Abbott RealTi m e MTB (RT MTB) assay is a new automated nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in clinical specimens. In combination with the RealTi m e MTB INH/RIF (RT MTB INH/RIF) resistance assay, which can be applied to RT MTB-positive specimens as an add-on assay, the tests also indicate the genetic markers of resistance to isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RT MTB using different types of respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens and to compare performance characteristics directly with those of the FluoroType MTB assay. The resistance results obtained by RT MTB INH/RIF were compared to those from the GenoType MTBDR plus and from phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. A total of 715 clinical specimens were analyzed. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of RT MTB was 92.1%; the sensitivity rates for smear-positive and smear-negative samples were 100% and 76.2%, respectively. The sensitivities of smear-negative specimens were almost identical for respiratory (76.3%) and extrapulmonary (76%) specimens. Specificity rates were 100% and 95.8% for culture-negative specimens and those that grew nontuberculous mycobacteria, respectively. RT MTB INH/RIF was applied to 233 RT MTB-positive samples and identified resistance markers in 7.7% of samples. Agreement with phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing was 99.5%. In conclusion, RT MTB and RT MTB INH/RIF allow for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in different types of specimens and reliably indicate resistance markers. The strengths of this system are the comparably high sensitivity with paucibacillary specimens, its ability to detect INH and RIF resistance, and its high-throughput capacities.

Download Full-text

Comparison of the Performances of Two In-House Rapid Methods for Antitubercular Drug Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.00960-08 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 53 (2) ◽

pp. 808-810 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Agustina I. de la Iglesia ◽

Emma J. Stella ◽

Héctor R. Morbidoni

Keyword(s):

Drug Resistance ◽

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽

Sensitivity And Specificity ◽

Susceptibility Testing ◽

Drug Susceptibility ◽

Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽

Antitubercular Drug ◽

Rapid Methods ◽

Resistance Assessment

ABSTRACT Resistance to rifampin (rifampicin), isoniazid, and streptomycin of 69 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates was analyzed by an in-house method based on mycobacteriophage D29 and a colorimetric micromethod. Both methods showed sensitivity and specificity values ranging from 93% to 100%. These simple methods offer an option for drug resistance assessment of M. tuberculosis.

Download Full-text