Hospice care delivered at home, in nursing homes and in dedicated hospice facilities: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Candy ◽  
A. Holman ◽  
B. Leurent ◽  
S. Davis ◽  
L. Jones
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii31-ii31
Author(s):  
Tomoko Omura ◽  
Yasuji Miyakita ◽  
Takaki Omura ◽  
Makoto Ohno ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite aggressive treatment with surgery and chemo-radiation therapy, it is difficult to cure patients with glioblastoma (GBM). The end-of-life (EOL) phase of patients with GBM, and related problems, have not yet been adequately studied. Most cancer patients died in the hospital (84%) in 2017, but the Japanese government has recommended palliative home-care and the number of deaths at home has recently been increasing. This study explores the current situation of EOL care for GBM patients in our hospital. METHODS We retrospectively examined the clinical course and EOL phase of 166 consecutive patients who were treated in our hospital between 2010 and 2017. RESULT In total, 107 patients died; 28 (26%) at home, 25 (23%) in hospice care, 9(9%) in nursing homes, 21(20%) in long-term care hospitals (LTCH), 13(12%) in our hospital, and 11(10%) in other neurosurgical hospitals. The median survival time and length of EOL phase for patients who died at home were 596 and 77 days; 469 and 103 days in hospice care; 528 days and 149 days in LTCH; 388 days and 52 days in our hospital; 802 and 91 days in other neurosurgical hospital; and 565 days and 55 days in nursing homes, respectively. The KPS of patients who transferred to LTCH or was started palliative care in other neurological hospital was 60. That of other patients was 50.The patients who died at home entered deep coma in the last 3.5 days (n=24) of life and could not take oral feeds for 7 days (n=26). CONCLUSION According to cancer patient study, the home-based palliative time of longer prognosis group were 59 days. EOL phase of GBM may be longer than other cancer. We must consider the problems of the EOL phase and improve the quality of EOL care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi206-vi207
Author(s):  
Tomoko Omura ◽  
Yasuji Miyakita ◽  
Makoto Ohno ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
Kenji Fujimoto ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite aggressive treatment with surgery and chemo-radiation therapy, it is difficult to cure patients with glioblastoma (GBM). The end-of-life (EOL) phase of patients with GBM, and related problems, have not yet been adequately studied. Unlike in other countries, most cancer patients died in the hospital (84%) in 2017, but the Japanese government has recommended palliative home care and the number of deaths at home has recently been increasing. This study explores the current situation of EOL care for GBM patients in Japan. METHODS We retrospectively examined the clinical course and EOL phase of 166 consecutive patients who were treated in our hospital between 2010 and 2017. RESULT: In total, 107 patients died; 27 (25.7%) at home, 24 (22.8%) in hospice care, 8 (7.6%) in nursing homes, 46 (43.9%) in hospitals (long-term care hospitals [LTCH; 19.8%], our hospital [13.3%], and other neurosurgical hospitals [10.4%]). According to our previous research, in 2001–2005, 6% of GBM patients died at home, 3% in hospice case, and 91% in the hospital. The KPSof patients who started palliative home care or transferred to another hospital was 50–60. The median survival time and length of EOL phase for patients who died at home were 498 and 76.5 days; 395 and 103 days in hospice care; 533 days and 149 days in LTCH; 374 days and 52 days in our hospital; 338 and 75.5 days in other neurosurgical hospital; and 557 days and 37 days in nursing homes, respectively. CONCLUSION The number of GBM patients who died at home in Japan is increasing, and we must consider the problems of the EOL phase and improve the quality of EOL care.


Author(s):  
Luiza Hoga ◽  
Juliana Rodolpho ◽  
Bruna Gonçalves ◽  
Bruna Quirino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document