Validation of USP apparatus 4 method for microsphere in vitro release testing using Risperdal® Consta®

2011 ◽  
Vol 420 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Rawat ◽  
Erika Stippler ◽  
Vinod P. Shah ◽  
Diane J. Burgess
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Raul Medina ◽  
Mariel Cortes ◽  
Erik Romo

Objective: The aim of this study was the comparison of the in vitro release performance of ibuprofen generic suspensions and reference, based on the hydrodynamic environment generated by the flow-through cell method (USP Apparatus 4). Results were compared with those obtained by the use of the USP Apparatus 2.Methods: The Advil® suspension (2 g/100 ml) and two generic formulations with the same dose were tested. Dissolution studies were carried out using a USP Apparatus 4 Sotax CE6 with 22.6 mm cells, laminar flow at 16 ml/min, and pH 7.2 phosphate buffer at 37.0±0.5 °C as dissolution medium. Ibuprofen was quantified spectrophotometrically at 222 nm. The in vitro release of the three drug products were studied using the USP Apparatus 2. The dissolution profiles of generic products were compared with the reference by model-independent, model-dependent, and analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based comparisons.Results: The dissolution profile of the generic product A was similar to the dissolution profile of reference, only with the use of the USP Apparatus 4. The f2 similarity factor was>50 and no significant differences were found with dissolution efficiency data (*P>0.05). Similar results were found with the comparison of t50% and t63.2% values. Similar dissolution profiles between generic product A and reference were also found with ANOVA-based comparisons.Conclusion: The flow-through cell method was adequate for study the in vitro release of ibuprofen suspensions. It is necessary to evaluate the in vivoperformance of the drug products used in order to estimate the predictability of the proposed methodology. 


ADMET & DMPK ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raúl Medina-López ◽  
Sergio Guillén-Moedano ◽  
Marcela Hurtado

<p class="ADMETabstracttext">Furosemide is a diuretic drug widely used in chronic renal failure. The drug has low solubility and permeability, which cause clinical problems. Studying the in vitro release performance elucidates the rate and extent of drug dissolved from dosage forms under different conditions. Furosemide reference tablets were tested using USP Apparatuses 1 and 2 as well as the flow-through cell method (USP Apparatus 4), a dissolution apparatus that simulates the human gastrointestinal tract better than the other methods. Dissolution profiles were created with USP Apparatuses 1 and 2 at 25, 50, and 75 rpm and 900 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, acetate buffer (pH 4.5), and phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). USP Apparatus 4 with a laminar flow of 16 mL/min and 22.6 mm cells was used. Drug dissolution was quantified at 274 nm for 60 min. Mean dissolution time, dissolution efficiency, time to 50 % dissolution, and time to 80 % dissolution data were used to compare dissolution profiles. Additionally, zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, Hixson-Crowell, Makoid-Banakar, and Weibull models were used to adjust furosemide dissolution data. Between USP Apparatus 1 and 2, significant differences were observed in almost all parameters at 50 and 75 rpm (p &lt; 0.05). A similar dissolution profile (f<sub>2</sub> &gt; 50) with a pharmacopoeial dissolution method (USP Apparatus 2 at 50 rpm and 900 mL of phosphate buffer pH 5.8) and USP Apparatus 4 (laminar flow of 16 mL/min, 22.6 mm cells, and pH 6.8) was observed. The Weibull function was the best mathematical model to describe the in vitro release performance of furosemide in the three USP dissolution apparatuses. These results could be used to manufacture better furosemide dosage forms and decrease the negative clinical impact of current furosemide formulations.</p>


Author(s):  
Madhur Kulkarni ◽  
Shrikant Potdar ◽  
Abhijit A. Date ◽  
Aditya Marfatiya

2014 ◽  
Vol 475 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline M. Morais ◽  
Diane J. Burgess

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Siewert ◽  
Jennifer Dressman ◽  
Cynthia Brown ◽  
Vinod Shah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document