Intrauterine exposure to Zika virus and hearing loss within the first few years of life: A systematic literature review

Author(s):  
Dimitrios Mitsikas ◽  
Chrysoula Gabrani ◽  
Konstantinos Giannakou ◽  
Demetris Lamnisos
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S164
Author(s):  
K. Hennegan ◽  
A. Silber ◽  
S. Dehipawala ◽  
K. Chithran ◽  
D. Lockhart

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Vos ◽  
Dorie Noll ◽  
Marie Pigeon ◽  
Marlene Bagatto ◽  
Elizabeth M. Fitzpatrick

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Øyvind Nordvik ◽  
Peder O. Laugen Heggdal ◽  
Jonas Brännström ◽  
Flemming Vassbotn ◽  
Anne Kari Aarstad ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Porter ◽  
Peter Creed ◽  
Michelle Hood ◽  
Teresa Y C Ching

Abstract Parents or caregivers of children who are deaf or hard of hearing are required to make complex and rational decisions soon after the confirmation of hearing loss. Ways of facilitating decision-making have been a focus within the healthcare sector for two decades and shared decision-making is now widely viewed as the standard for good clinical care. A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify the extent to which the principles of shared decision-making and informed choice have been implemented for parents when they make decisions related to their children with permanent hearing loss. Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed papers describing the results of original research published from 2000 to 2017, yielding 37 relevant papers. Studies were reviewed using the three phases of decision-making—information exchange, deliberation, and implementation. Two decisions dominated these studies—implantable devices and communication modality. Most papers dealt with decision-making in the context of bilateral hearing loss, with only one study focusing on unilateral hearing loss. The review identified gaps where further research is needed to ensure the lessons learnt in the broader decision-making literature are implemented when parents make decisions regarding their child who is deaf or hard of hearing.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Pizarek ◽  
Valeriy Shafiro ◽  
Patricia McCarthy

Computerized auditory training (CAT) is a convenient, low-cost approach to improving communication of individuals with hearing loss or other communicative disorders. A number of CAT programs are being marketed to patients and audiologists. The present literature review is an examination of evidence for the effectiveness of CAT in improving speech perception in adults with hearing impairments. Six current CAT programs, used in 9 published studies, were reviewed. In all 9 studies, some benefit of CAT for speech perception was demonstrated. Although these results are encouraging, the overall quality of available evidence remains low, and many programs currently on the market have not yet been evaluated. Thus, caution is needed when selecting CAT programs for specific patients. It is hoped that future researchers will (a) examine a greater number of CAT programs using more rigorous experimental designs, (b) determine which program features and training regimens are most effective, and (c) indicate which patients may benefit from CAT the most.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document