CMO equity incentive and shareholder value: Moderating role of CMO managerial discretion

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 725-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
MinChung Kim ◽  
D. Eric Boyd ◽  
Namwoon Kim ◽  
Cheong H. Yi
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 798-814
Author(s):  
Aylin Ataay

AbstractInconsistent findings from prior research on the performance consequences of new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) origin led us to study the moderating effect of managerial discretion on the link between CEO outsiderness and firms’ post-succession performance. Data from 75 CEO succession events from an emerging economy show that new CEO outsiderness, without managerial discretion context influences, has no direct impact on post-succession performance. Further, our findings emphasise the moderating impacts of managerial discretion, stemming from factors in a company’s external and internal contingencies, which either strengthen or weaken the association between new CEO outsiderness and post-succession firm performance. It is found that market complexity, but not munificence, provides CEOs with more discretion in the Turkish context, thus strengthening the positive associations between CEO origin and firm performance. Firms inertia weakens both managerial discretion level and the association between CEO outsiderness and firm performance. The results show that internal corporate governance also matters. Finally, when a CEO assumes the dual role of both the chairman and the CEO, the link between CEO outsiderness and performance of the firm becomes stronger.


2012 ◽  
Vol 452-453 ◽  
pp. 412-416
Author(s):  
Chang Zheng Zhang ◽  
Kai Gan

The paper focuses on the special manipulation effect of managerial discretion on CEO pay considering the moderating role of monitoring intensity in China. The paper empirically indicates that the manipulation effect of managerial discretion on CEO pay does exist, and quantitatively describes the degree of the manipulation effect, which shows that the manipulation effect of managerial discretion on CEO pay significantly decreases. The results prove that monitoring intensity can restrain the manipulation effect of managerial discretion on CEO pay. Only under a certain monitoring intensity, will CEO pay not exceed the reasonable level too heavily.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-616
Author(s):  
Runhui Lin ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Adedigba Olawoyin

Purpose Overconfidence as an important psychological factor can also affect CEO’s cognitive preferences, while there are few studies about the impact of CEO’ overconfidence on the international expansion of companies. This paper aims to fill this gap and further discuss the moderating role of CEO’s overseas experience, CEO duality and ownership. Design/methodology/approach The authors focus on the Chinese context, collect 2008–2016 data from China's manufacturing industry as sample, use fixed effect model to analyse the effect of CEO overconfidence on international expansion strategy of Chinese firms. Findings The empirical results show that: CEO overconfidence positively promotes the degree of firm internationalization. CEO foreign experience positively affects the internationalization degree, but can restrain overconfidence thus negatively regulate this impact relationship. When duality is present, both CEO power and managerial discretion are pronounced and they exhibit a stronger effect. Firm’s equity nature will affect the relationship between CEOs' overconfidence and the degree of internationalization. Compared with private enterprises, CEOs in state-owned enterprises have limited power, therefore, this influence relationship is weaker. Originality/value This study has emphasized the importance of top executives' psychological characteristics on firm internationalization, which is key application and complement of upper echelons theory and fills the research gap in the literature. In this paper, the authors found the advantages of overconfidence for firms, which helps to understand the complex meaning of overconfidence. The results of moderating effect further explore the application of overconfidence in different context, which has some implications for management practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document