MRI and 4D-CT Minimum Intensity Projection Volumes in Patients undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatic Lesions

2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. S252-S253
Author(s):  
W.G. Rule ◽  
P. DeRose ◽  
T. Boike ◽  
S. Shaddock ◽  
R. Timmerman ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren D. D’Souza ◽  
Daryl P. Nazareth ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Chad Deyoung ◽  
Mohan Suntharalingam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Alex R. Coffman ◽  
Daniel C. Sufficool ◽  
Joseph I. Kang ◽  
Chung-Tsen Hsueh ◽  
Sasha Swenson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-199
Author(s):  
Milovan Savanovic ◽  
Bojan Strbac ◽  
Drazan Jaros ◽  
Jean-Noel Foulquier

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the breathing amplitude, tumor motion, patient positioning, and treatment volumes among consecutive four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scans, during the simulation for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).Material and methods: The variation and shape of the breathing amplitude, patient positioning, and treatment volumes were evaluated for 55 lung cancer patients after consecutive 4D-CT acquisitions, scanned at one-week intervals. The impact of variation in the breathing amplitude on lung tumor motion was determined for 20 patients. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured from a free-breathing CT scan and at ten phases of the respiratory cycle, for both 4D-CTs (440 phases in total).Results: Breathing amplitude decreased by 3.6 (3.4-4.9) mm, tumor motion by 3.2 (0.4-5.0) mm while breathing period increased by 4 (2-6) s, inter-scan for 20 patients. Intra-scan variation was 4 times greater for the breathing amplitude, 5 times for the breathing period, and 8 times for the breathing cycle, comparing irregular versus regular breathing patterns for 55 patients. Using coaching, the breathing amplitude increases 3 to 8 mm, and the breathing period 2 to 6 s. Differences in the contoured treatment volumes were less than 10% between consecutive scans. Patient positioning remained stable, with a small inter-scan difference of 1.1 (0.6-1.4) mm.Conclusion: Decreasing the inter-scan breathing amplitude decreases the tumor motion reciprocally. When the breathing amplitude decreases, the breathing period increases at inter- and intra-scan, especially during irregular breathing. Coaching improves respiration, keeping the initial shape of the breathing amplitude. Contoured treatment volumes and patient positioning were reproducible through successive scans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document