Analysis of Late Toxicity of a Phase I/II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel, Concurrent Radiation (RT) and Androgen Ablation (AA) in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer (LAPC) or after Radical Prostatectomy (RP)

Author(s):  
A. Mirmiran ◽  
Y. Kwok ◽  
P. Amin ◽  
A. Hussain
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e038678
Author(s):  
Yu-Tian Xiao ◽  
Xianzhi Zhao ◽  
Yifan Chang ◽  
Xiaojun Lu ◽  
Ye Wang ◽  
...  

IntroductionPatients with locally advanced prostate cancer are at high risk of recurrence after definitive treatment. There are emerging data that radical prostatectomy can delay the progression of castration resistance and potentially prolong survival. Neoadjuvant radiation therapy improves local control and has shown survival benefit with favourable toxicity profiles in several other malignancies. We have designed this trial to investigate whether this combination, which theoretically maximises local control, is a safe and feasible approach for treating locally advanced prostate cancer.Methods and analysisThis study is a phase I, open-label study to investigate the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant hormone and radiation therapy followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by a traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design with four planned radiation dose levels (39.6 Gy/22F, 45 Gy/25F, 50.4 Gy/28F and 54 Gy/30F). Locally advanced prostate cancer patients with positive pelvic and/or retroperitoneal lymph nodes will be recruited. The primary objective is to determine the adverse events and maximal tolerable dose (MTD) of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Toxicity will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria V.5.0.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Changhai Hospital (ref. CHEC2019-070 and CHEC2019-082). The study will be performed in compliance with applicable local legislation and in accordance with the ethical principles developed by the World Medical Association in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013. Study results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals.Trial registration numbersChiCTR1900022716; ChiCTR1900022754.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1050-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis A. Pettaway ◽  
Louis L. Pisters ◽  
Patricia Troncoso ◽  
Joel Slaton ◽  
Laury Finn ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility and efficacy of integrating chemotherapy and androgen ablation with radical prostatectomy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. The neoadjuvant approach was adopted because it allows an in situ assessment of antitumoral activity.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled who met the clinical criteria of stage T1–2, Gleason score of ≥ 8 or T2b-T2c, Gleason score of 7 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 10 ng/mL (n = 15), or clinical stage T3 (n = 18). Therapy consisted of 12 weeks of ketoconazole and doxorubicin alternating with vinblastine, estramustine, and androgen ablation followed by prostatectomy. The ability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy to induce a 20% rate of pT0 in the prostatectomy specimen as well as surgical feasibility were assessed.RESULTS: Chemotherapy complications were comparable to those reported with this regimen previously. No major intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 (33%) of 30 patients. One patient died at home after discharge (postoperative day 17; no autopsy was performed). Ten (33%) of the 30 patients had organ-confined disease, and 20 (70%) of 30 had extraprostatic extension; 11 (37%) of the 30 had positive lymph nodes. Only five (17%) of 30 exhibited positive surgical margins. All patients achieved an undetectable PSA level postoperatively, and 20 of the surviving 29 patients remain without disease recurrence with a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 9 to 18 months).CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy and androgen ablation followed by radical prostatectomy was feasible in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Although the goal of achieving a 20% rate for pT0 status was not achieved, we believe this type of integrated therapeutic strategy should be investigated further for its ability to alter the course of regionally advanced prostate cancer.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16103-e16103 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Granberg ◽  
R. H. Thompson ◽  
J. F. Quevedo ◽  
R. J. Karnes ◽  
I. Frank ◽  
...  

e16103 Background: At present, androgen ablation (AA) therapy ± radiation therapy represents a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced prostate cancer (CAP), typically resulting in palliative disease control. Immunotherapy, in the form of CTLA-4 blockade, has been shown to potentiate T-cell responses, representing a potential antitumoral immunotherapy for treating CAP. Here, we discuss the outcomes of 5 locally advanced CAP patients treated with the monoclonal antibody MDX-CTLA-4 (MDX-010) + AA who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), 2 of whom exhibited striking down-staging of their disease. Methods: A Phase II trial testing AA + MDX-010 therapy for treatment of locally or systemically advanced CAP is currently ongoing at our institution. To date, 5/85 patients have electively opted for off-study RP with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy after documentation of robust treatment response by PSA, staging digital rectal exam, and 3-D imaging. Results: All men had unresectable, locally advanced disease (stage T2c-T4) prior to treatment with AA + MDX-010 and subsequently underwent RP. Median blood loss was 400mL (400–900). All patients had negative surgical margins. Of the 5 patients, 2 exhibited dramatic and indisputable down-staging of their disease. These two patients presented with 80% of biopsies involved with cancer, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle (SV) invasion, and bladder base involvement. On final pathology, both exhibited extensive treatment effect, remission of SV involvement, and robust disaggregation of solid tumors resulting in only microscopic, non-contiguous foci of residual intraprostatic cancer. Both had T4 disease pre-treatment, and had stage T2c on final pathology. One patient is free of disease with undetectable PSA for 19 months following adjuvant radiation treatment but no further therapy, while the other patient is awaiting follow-up. Conclusions: We have been able to demonstrate true down-staging of locally advanced prostate cancer with neoadjuvant AA + MDX-010 therapy. This therapeutic modality exhibits significant promise for men with unresectable disease and may provide durable and potentially curative cancer control. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document