A Comparison of Quality of Life for Early Stage Breast Cancer Examining Whole Breast IMRT versus Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S609-S610 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Flynn ◽  
C. Mitchell ◽  
A. Limbacher ◽  
F. Vicini ◽  
A. Martinez
2019 ◽  
pp. 102-112
Author(s):  
Mahdi Aghili ◽  
Marzieh Lashkari ◽  
Mohammad Babaei ◽  
Sepideh Mansouri

Background: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is defined as applying high doses of radiation with a shorter interval to the lumpectomy cavity in the setting of breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. This treatment strategy is attractive to patients, and its utilization has increased during recent years because of the shorter treatment schedule, better cosmetic outcomes, and acceptable local control rates in selected patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Here we provide an overview of various APBI techniques in terms of clinical and cosmetic outcomes, quality of life, and cost of treatment. We also review the current guidelines for selecting suitable breast cancer patients for APBI strategy.Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed between 1996 -2019 that was made was made for case series and randomized studies with at least 2 years of follow-up in term of clinical and cosmetic outcomes, quality of life, and treatment costs. Results: Technological advances have made various APBI modalities, including intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and external-beam radiation therapy, more accessible in the community. Mature data from several randomized and prospective nonrandomized trials have contributed to the development of consensus guidelines for selecting the most appropriate candidates ABPI.Conclusion: APBI represent an attractive treatment option for appropriately selected patients with early breast cancer. Irrespective to various techniques used for APBI it is very important to select the most appropriate patient population according to reliable guidelines for this treatment strategy that could be non-inferiority to whole breast irradiation especially in high-volume radiation centers with long waiting lists and for patients who live far away from the radiotherapy centers.


Author(s):  
Daphne H. M. Jacobs ◽  
Ramona K. Charaghvandi ◽  
Nanda Horeweg ◽  
John H. Maduro ◽  
Gabrielle Speijer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate and compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) of women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with different radiotherapy (RT) regimens. Methods Data were collected from five prospective cohorts of BC patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and different RT regimens: intraoperative RT (IORT, 1 × 23.3 Gy; n = 267), external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (EB-APBI, 10 × 3.85 Gy; n = 206), hypofractionated whole breast irradiation(hypo-WBI, 16 × 2.67 Gy; n = 375), hypo-WBI + boost(hypo-WBI-B, 21–26 × 2.67 Gy; n = 189), and simultaneous WBI + boost(WBI-B, 28 × 2.3 Gy; n = 475). Women ≥ 60 years with invasive/in situ carcinoma ≤ 30 mm, cN0 and pN0-1a were included. Validated EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 questionnaires were used to asses HRQL. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for confounding (age, comorbidity, pT, locoregional treatment, systemic therapy) were used to compare the impact of the RT regimens on HRQL at 12 and 24 months. Differences in HRQL over time (3–24 months) were evaluated using linear mixed models. Results There were no significant differences in HRQL at 12 months between groups except for breast symptoms which were better after IORT and EB-APBI compared to hypo-WBI at 12 months (p < 0.001). Over time, breast symptoms, fatigue, global health status and role functioning were significantly better after IORT and EB-APBI than hypo-WBI. At 24 months, HRQL was comparable in all groups. Conclusion In women with early-stage breast cancer, the radiotherapy regimen did not substantially influence long-term HRQL with the exception of breast symptoms. Breast symptoms are more common after WBI than after IORT or EB-APBI and improve slowly until no significant difference remains at 2 years posttreatment.


2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71
Author(s):  
Timothy M Pawlik ◽  
Henry M Kuerer

Breast-conserving therapy has been established as a standard treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer. Whole-breast irradiation has traditionally been utilized to consolidate local therapy following conservative surgery. Recently, the need for whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery has become controversial, with some investigators advocating accelerated partial breast irradiation as an alternative. Accelerated partial breast irradiation is delivered over a shorter period and only to a portion of the breast. This review will examine the emerging role of accelerated partial breast irradiation in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer and review the biologic rationale for, techniques of, and limitations of partial breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document