scholarly journals Trends in the Utilization of Adjuvant Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy and/or External Beam Radiation Treatment in Stage I and II Endometrial Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul K. Patel ◽  
Michele L. Cote ◽  
Rouba Ali-Fehmi ◽  
Thomas Buekers ◽  
Adnan R. Munkarah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Stage I ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Vaginal Cuff ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
End Results

Impact of vaginal brachytherapy on survival in stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 789-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam AlHilli ◽  
Sudha Amarnath ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Sean Dowdy
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Stage Ia

ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in use of radiation therapy and its impact on overall survival in low- and high-grade stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.MethodsPatients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2004 to 2013 were identified through the National Cancer Database and classified as: stage IA G1/2, stage IA G3, stage IB G1/2, and stage IB G3. Trends in use of vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy were assessed. Overall survival was measured from surgery and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of radiation therapy on overall survival was assessed within each stage/grade group using Cox proportional hazards analysis in propensity-matched treatment groups.ResultsA total of 132 393 patients met inclusion criteria, and 81% of patients had stage IA and 19% had stage IB endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 18% of patients: 52% received vaginal brachytherapy, 30% external beam radiation therapy, and 18% chemotherapy ±radiation therapy. External beam radiation therapy use decreased from 9% in 2004 to 4% in 2012, while vaginal brachytherapy use increased from 8% to 14%. Stage IA G1/2 patients did not benefit from either external beam radiation therapy or vaginal brachytherapy, while administration of vaginal brachytherapy improved overall survival in stage IB G1/2 compared with no treatment (p<0.0001). In stage IB G1/2 and stage IA G3, vaginal brachytherapy was superior to external beam radiation therapy (p=0.0004 and p=0.004, respectively). Stage IB G3 patients had improved overall survival with either vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy versus no treatment but no difference in overall survival was seen between vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (p=0.94).ConclusionsThe delivery of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with stage IA G1/2 endometrial carcinoma is not associated with improvement in overall survival. Patients with stage IB G1/2 and G3 as well as stage IA G3 are shown to benefit from improved overall survival when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered. These findings demonstrate potential opportunities to reduce both overtreatment and undertreatment in stage I endometrial cancer patients.

Impact of different adjuvant radiotherapy modalities on women with early-stage intermediate- to high-risk endometrial cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1264-1270
Author(s):  
Meng Jin ◽  
Xiaorong Hou ◽  
Xiansun Sun ◽  
Yuelun Zhang ◽  
Ke Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation

ObjectiveVaginal brachytherapy was recommended for patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, however, optimal radiotherapy modalities for intermediate-high- or high-risk patients remains controversial. Previous studies have mainly focused on survival outcomes and have seldom taken cost issues into consideration, especially for high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the survival outcomes and costs associated with two adjuvant radiotherapy modalities in the management of patients with early-stage, intermediate- to high-risk endometrial cancer.MethodsAccording to ESMO-ESCO-ESTRO criteria, 238 patients with stage I/II, intermediate- to high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent radiotherapy from January 2003 to December 2015 at our institution were reviewed. The vaginal brachytherapy group and external beam radiation therapy combined with the vaginal brachytherapy group were propensity score-matched at a 1:1 ratio. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used.ResultsA total of 361 patients met our inclusion criteria, the median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 28–85). All were diagnosed with stage I–II endometrial cancer (324 with stage I and 37 with stage II; 350 with endometrioid adenocarcinoma; and 10 with mucinous carcinoma). The median follow-up time was 60.5 months (range, 3–177). Among 119 matched pairs, no significant differences were found in overall (10.9% vs 8.4%, P=0.51), locoregional (4.2% vs 1.7%, P=0.45), or distant recurrence rates (6.7% vs 6.7%, P=1.0) between the two groups. There were also no differences in the 5-year overall (94.8% vs 93.9%, P=0.78) or progression-free survival (90.0% vs 84.4%, P=0.23) between the two groups. The rates of acute and late toxicity were significantly higher in the external beam radiation therapy combined with vaginal brachytherapy vs the vaginal brachytherapy group (all P<0.05), except for the acute hematological toxicity rate (17.6% vs 9.2%, P=0.06). External beam radiation therapy combined with vaginal brachytherapy had a higher median cost ($2759 vs $937, P<0.001) and longer median radiotherapy duration (41 days vs 17 days, P<0.001) than vaginal brachytherapy.ConclusionVaginal brachytherapy was associated with similar local control and long-term survival outcomes relative to the combination of external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy and it also minimizes radiation-related complications, reduces medical costs, and shortens radiotherapy duration. Vaginal brachytherapy may be the optimal radiation modality for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at intermediate to high risk.

Age and Radiation Response in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1288-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Susan M. Chang ◽  
David A. Larson ◽  
Penny K. Sneed ◽  
William M. Wara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale Score ◽  
Performance Scale

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Advanced age is a strong predictor of shorter survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GM), especially for those who receive multimodality treatment. Radiographically assessed tumor response to external beam radiation therapy is an important prognostic factor in GM. We hypothesized that older GM patients might have more radioresistant tumors. METHODS We studied radiographically assessed response to external beam radiation treatment (five-level scale) in relation to age and other prognostic factors in a cohort of 301 GM patients treated on two prospective clinical protocols. A total of 223 patients (74%) were assessable for radiographically assessed radiation response. A proportional odds ordinal regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Younger age (P = 0.006), higher Karnofsky Performance Scale score before radiotherapy (P = 0.027), and more extensive surgical resection (P = 0.028) predicted better radiation response in univariate analyses. Results were similar when clinical criteria were used to classify an additional 61 patients without radiographically assessed radiation response (stable versus progressive disease). In multivariate analyses, age and extent of resection were significant independent predictors of radiation response (P &lt; 0.05); Karnofsky Performance Scale score was of borderline significance (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION Older GM patients are less likely to have good responses to postoperative external beam radiation therapy. Karnofsky Performance Scale score before radiation treatment and extent of surgical resection are additional predictors of radiographically assessed radiation response in GM.

Concurrent 5-Fluorouracil, Mitomycin C and Radiation, with or without Brachytherapy, in Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: A Scoring System to Predict Clinical Response and Outcome

2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Smaniotto ◽  
Giuseppe D'Agostino ◽  
Stefano Luzi ◽  
Vincenzo Valentini ◽  
Gabriella Macchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Aims and background This prospective, phase II study aimed to test the efficacy of concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiation, with or without brachytherapy, on the clinical outcome of a series of recurrent endometrial cancer patients and to determine the prognostic impact of a subset of factors. Methods Thirty patients with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic endometrial cancer received external beam radiation (4-week split course: 23.4 + 23.4 Gy) plus two courses of concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, 96-h continous infusion, days 1-4; 1 g/m2/day; mitomycin C, 10 mg/m2, bolus iv, day 1). Nineteen patients (63.3%) underwent endocavitary, low-dose brachytherapy boost (20-25 Gy); eight patients (26.7%) received external beam radiation boost (14-20 Gy). Results Eleven complete responses (36.7%), 11 partial responses (36.7%), 6 disease stabilizations (20.0%) and 2 progressions (6.6%) were observed. After a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 1-108), overall actuarial 3-year survival, progression-free survival and local progression-free survival were 46.8%, 35.2% and 41.2%, respectively. Two patients (6.7%) experienced hematological grade 3 toxicity. Two patients (6.7%) had grade 3 intestinal toxicity. Severe late toxicity was infrequent, only 3 patients showing severe vaginal stenosis (10.0%). A clinical score of 0 to 1 was assigned to each patient on the basis of the absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1) of any of the following prognostic factors: time between surgery and recurrence shorter than 12 months, pelvic wall site of recurrence, positive lymph nodes, hemoglobin <11 g/dL. With this device, it was clear that patients with a low score had a significantly better outcome (clinical remission: 77.2% of patients with a score <2 vs 25.0% of patients with a score ≥2, P = 0.009), better local control of the disease (50.2% vs. 0 at 3 years, P = 0.014,) and better overall survival (65.8% vs 0 at 3 years, P = 0.003). Conclusions Our data suggest that this combined modality therapy was relatively well tolerated and resulted in reasonable local control and survival. The scoring system proved to be helpful in identifying patients with the best chance of benefiting from the treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document