Neurological Outcome and Survival after Radiosurgery of High-Grade Epidural Spinal Cord Compression

Author(s):  
S. Ryu ◽  
I. Lee ◽  
J. Rock
2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Laufer ◽  
Andrew Hanover ◽  
Eric Lis ◽  
Yoshiya Yamada ◽  
Mark Bilsky

Object In this paper, the authors' goal was to determine the outcome of reoperation for recurrent epidural spinal cord compression in patients with metastatic spine disease. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent spine surgery at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1996 and 2007. Thirty-nine patients who underwent reoperation of the spine at the level previously treated with surgery were identified. Only patients whose reoperation was performed because of tumor recurrence leading to high-grade epidural spinal cord compression or recurrence with no further radiation options were included in the study. Patients who underwent reoperations exclusively for instrumentation failure were excluded. All patients underwent additional decompression via a posterolateral approach without removal of the spinal instrumentation. Results Patients underwent 1–4 reoperations at the same level. A median survival time of 12.4 months was noted after the first reoperation, and a median survival time of 9.1 months was noted after the last reoperation. At last follow-up 22 (65%) of 34 patients were ambulatory at the time of last follow-up or death, and the median time between loss-of-ambulation and death was 1 month. Functional status was maintained or improved by one Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade in 97% of patients. A major surgical complication rate of 5% was noted. Conclusions Reoperation represents a viable option in patients with high-grade epidural spinal cord compression who have recurrent metastatic tumors at previously operated spinal levels. In carefully selected patients, reoperation can prolong ambulation and result in good functional and neurological outcomes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1383-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Quraishi ◽  
T. S. Rajagopal ◽  
S. R. Manoharan ◽  
S. Elsayed ◽  
K. L. Edwards ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 907-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOHAMED FAWZY ◽  
MOHAMED EL-BELTAGY ◽  
MAGED EL SHAFEI ◽  
MOHAMED SAAD ZAGHLOUL ◽  
NAGLAA AL KINAAI ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-677
Author(s):  
Muhammad Omar Chohan ◽  
Sweena Kahn ◽  
Gustav Cederquist ◽  
Anne S Reiner ◽  
Joseph Schwab ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Spine and nonspine skeletal metastases occur in more than 80% of patients with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To examine the characteristics of the patient population undergoing surgery for the treatment of prostate cancer metastatic to the spine. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients treated at our institution from June 1993 to August 2014 for surgical management of metastatic spine disease from prostate cancer. RESULTS During the study period, 139 patients with 157 surgical lesions underwent surgery for metastatic spine disease. Decompression for high-grade epidural spinal cord compression was required for 126 patients with 143 lesions. Preoperatively, 69% had a motor deficit and 21% were nonambulatory, with 32% due to motor weakness. At surgery, 87% of patients had hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) and 61% failed prior radiation. Median overall survival for HRPC patients was 6.6 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-8.6) while the median overall survival for hormone-sensitive patients was 16.3 mo (95% CI: 4.0-26.6). CONCLUSION The majority of patients undergoing surgery for prostate cancer metastases to the spine were refractory to hormone therapy, indicating that patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer are unlikely to develop symptomatic spinal cord compression or spinal instability. A significant number of HRPC patients presented with neurological deficits attributable to spinal cord compression. Vigilant monitoring for the development of signs and symptoms of epidural spinal cord compression and spinal instability in hormone-refractory patients is recommended. Surgical decision making may be affected by the much shorter postoperative survival for HRPC patients as compared to patients with hormone-sensitive cancer.


Spine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (24) ◽  
pp. 2669-2674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Putz ◽  
Bernd Wiedenhöfer ◽  
Hans Jürgen Gerner ◽  
Carl Hans Fürstenberg

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Iida ◽  
Yoshihiro Matsumoto ◽  
Nokitaka Setsu ◽  
Katsumi Harimaya ◽  
Kenichi Kawaguchi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e195-e196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew David Sewell ◽  
Rachel Dbeis ◽  
Peter Bliss ◽  
Tony Watkinson ◽  
Mike Hutton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document