Quality of Life in Relation to Pain Response to Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 694-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulien G. Westhoff ◽  
Alexander de Graeff ◽  
Evelyn M. Monninkhof ◽  
Jacqueline Pomp ◽  
Marco van Vulpen ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 1391-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulien G. Westhoff ◽  
Mathilde G.E. Verdam ◽  
Frans J. Oort ◽  
Jan J. Jobsen ◽  
Marco van Vulpen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-222
Author(s):  
Ayat Faris ◽  
José Expósito ◽  
Antonio Martínez-Única ◽  
Juan Pedro Arrebola ◽  
Francisco Miguel Pérez-Carrascosa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (05) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floor Overbeek ◽  
John de Klerk ◽  
Pieternel Pasker-de Jong ◽  
Alexandra van den Berk ◽  
Rob ter Heine ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: Rhenium-188-HEDP (188Re-HEDP) is an effective radiopharmaceutical for the palliative treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases. However, only limited data on its routine use are available and its effect on quality of life (QoL) has not been studied. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical benefit of 188Re-HEDP in routine clinical care. Patients and methods: Prostate or breast cancer patients with painful bone metastases receiving 188Re-HEDP as a routine clinical procedure were eligible for evaluation. Clinical benefit was assessed in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Pain palliation and QoL were monitored using the visual analogue scale (VAS), corrected for opioid intake, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global health status/QoL-scale. Thrombocyte and leukocyte nadirs were used to assess haematological toxicity. Results: 45 and 47 patients were evaluable for pain palliation and QoL, respectively. After a single injection of 188Re-HEDP, the overall pain response rate was 69% and mean VAS-scores decreased relevantly and significantly (p < 0.05). Repeated treatment resulted in similar pain response. The overall QoL response rate was 68% and mean Global health status/QoL-scores increased relevantly and significantly. Haematological side effects were mild and transient. Conclusion: The clinically relevant response on pain and quality of life and the limited adverse events prove clinical benefit of treatment with 188Re-HEDP and support its use in routine clinical care. Its effectiveness appears comparable to that of external beam radiotherapy.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Pistevou-Gompaki ◽  
Vassilis E. Kouloulias ◽  
Charalambos Varveris ◽  
Kyriaki Mystakidou ◽  
Grigoris Georgakopoulos ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S205
Author(s):  
P.G. Westhoff ◽  
A. de Graeff ◽  
A.K. Reyners ◽  
C.C. Rodenhuis ◽  
M. van Vulpen ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Brian J. Schiro ◽  
Justin Sporrer ◽  
Muni Rubens ◽  
Haley R. Appel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Spine metastasis is a common occurrence in cancer patients and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with modest rates of pain relief, high rates of disease recurrence, low response rates for those with radioresistant histologies, and limited improvement in neurologic deficits. The addition of radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) to index sites together with EBRT may improve pain response rates and corresponding quality of life. Methods/design This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with spine metastasis from T5-L5, stratified according to tumor type (radioresistant vs. radiosensitive) in which patients in each stratum will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either RFA/PVA and EBRT or EBRT alone. All patients will be treated with EBRT to a dose of 20–30 Gy in 5–10 fractions. The target parameters will be measured and recorded at the baseline clinic visit, and daily at home with collection of weekly measurements at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months following treatment with imaging and QOL assessments. Discussion The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether RFA/PVA in addition to EBRT improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastasis, defined as complete or partial pain relief (measured using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale [NRPS]) at 3 months. Secondary objectives include determining whether combined modality treatment improves the rapidity of pain response, duration of pain response, patient reported pain impact, health utility, and overall QOL. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04375891. Registered on 5 May 2020.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document