scholarly journals The Impact of Radiation Treatment Time on Survival in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talha Shaikh ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Colin T. Murphy ◽  
Ranee Mehra ◽  
John A. Ridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Radiation Treatment Time ◽  
The Impact

Increased local failure risk with prolonged radiation treatment time in head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy

Head & Neck ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1120-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald M. Cannon ◽  
Heather M. Geye ◽  
Gregory K. Hartig ◽  
Anne M. Traynor ◽  
Tien Hoang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Local Failure ◽  
Failure Risk ◽  
Radiation Treatment Time

Quality of Life of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Cetuximab, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin Comparing to Cetuximab, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin and Docetaxel within the CEFCID Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Goerling ◽  
Thomas Gauler ◽  
Andreas Dietz ◽  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Stephan Knipping ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Global Quality Of Life ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: CeFCiD was a multicenter phase II study comparing the efficacy of cetuximab, 5-flourouracil, cisplatin with the same regimen adding docetaxel in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. The primary analysis trial did not demonstrate survival benefit from therapy intensification in first-line recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The current analysis of the trial assessed the impact of treatment on quality of life (QoL). Methods: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the tumor specific module for head and neck cancer (QLQ-H&N35) were used to assess QoL at baseline (visit 1), after 2 (visit 3), 4 (visit 5), and 6 (visit 7) cycles of chemotherapy. Results: Of 180 patients included in this study, 86 patients (47.8%) completed the questionnaires at baseline. Considering selected scores over treatment time, there was no difference in global quality of life, dyspnea, swallowing and speech between the treatment arms in the course. For fatigue a significant increase from baseline to visit 3 (p=0.02), visit 5 (p=0.002), and to visit 7 (p=0.003) was observed for patients receiving docetaxel (D), cisplatin or carboplatin (P), 5-FU (F) and cetuximab (C). At the end of chemotherapy the manifestation of fatigue was similar compared in the two treatment arms. Discussion/Conclusion: Therapy intensification not adversely affect selected scores of QoL of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. Nevertheless, fatigue seems to be pronounced in patients treated with docetaxel.

scholarly journals Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-02): A reminder app developed to reduce radiation dermatitis in patients with head-and-neck cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Rades ◽  
Carlos Narvaez ◽  
Claudia Dömer ◽  
Stefan Janssen ◽  
Denise Olbrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Radiation Dermatitis ◽  
Full Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer can be associated with significant toxicities including dermatitis and oral mucositis. Severe toxicities may require interruptions of the radiation treatment associated with impairment of the patients’ prognoses. This study will investigate whether the addition of a reminder app to standard care can reduce dermatitis and oral mucositis rates during radiotherapy in these patients. Methods: This randomized trial compares standard care supported by a reminder app (Arm A) to standard care alone (Arm B) with respect to grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis and oral mucositis at 60Gy of radiotherapy, the minimum planned dose for patients receiving definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Moreover, radiation-induced dermatitis and oral mucositis grade ≥3 at 60Gy and both grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 at the end of radiation treatment (EOT) will be evaluated, as well as quality of life and pain. According to sample size calculations, 80 patients are required per arm within the full analysis set. Taking into account that 5% of patients will not qualify for full analysis set, 168 patients should be randomized. The impact of the reminder app will be considered clinically relevant, if the rates of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis (primary endpoint) and oral mucositis (secondary endpoint) can be reduced by 20%. Discussion: If the addition of a reminder app to standard care will lead to a significant reduction of radiation dermatitis and oral mucositis, it could become a helpful tool for head-and-neck cancer patients during radiotherapy. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04110977; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04110977). Registered on 27th of September, 2019. First patient is planned to be included in December 2019.

scholarly journals The impact of time after radiation treatment on dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer enrolled in a swallowing therapy program

Head & Neck ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 606-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Van Daele ◽  
Susan E. Langmore ◽  
Gintas P. Krisciunas ◽  
Cathy L. Lazarus ◽  
Barbara R. Pauloski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Swallowing Therapy ◽  
Therapy Program ◽  
The Impact

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on suspected head and neck cancer two-week-wait referrals

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
N Bhamra ◽  
B Gorman ◽  
W Arnold ◽  
A Rajah ◽  
K Jolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Increasing Mean Age of Head and Neck Cancer Patients at a German Tertiary Referral Center

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 832
Author(s):  
Julius M. Vahl ◽  
Marlene C. Wigand ◽  
Michael Denkinger ◽  
Dhayana Dallmeier ◽  
Chiara Steiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Catchment Area ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Tertiary Referral ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Referral Center ◽  
The Impact

Background: The impact of demographic change on the age at diagnosis in German head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is unclear. Here we present an evaluation of aging trends in HNC at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on aging trends at the initial diagnosis of newly diagnosed patients with HNC between 2004 and 2018 at the head and neck cancer center Ulm in relation to demographic data of the catchment area. Results: The study population consisted of 2450 individuals diagnosed with HNC with a mean age of 62.84 (±11.67) years. We observed a significant increase in annual incidence rates and mean age over time. Mean age among HNC patients increased significantly more than among the population in the catchment area. Whereas the incidence rate of patients <50 years did not change, the incidence of HNC patients aged ≥70 years increased the most. The mean patient age in the main tumor sites increased significantly. Surprisingly, HPV-positive patients were not younger than HPV-negative patients, but showed a non-significant trend towards a higher mean age (63.0 vs. 60.7 years). Conclusions: Increasing incidence rates in older patients pose a challenge for health care systems. A nationwide study is needed to assess the dynamics and impact of aging on the incidence of HNC.

scholarly journals Impacts of Environmental Factors on Head and Neck Cancer Pathogenesis and Progression

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Marisol Miranda-Galvis ◽  
Reid Loveless ◽  
Luiz Paulo Kowalski ◽  
Yong Teng
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Gene Environment ◽  
The Impact

Epidemiological and clinical studies over the past two decades have provided strong evidence that genetic elements interacting with environmental components can individually and collectively influence one’s susceptibility to cancer. In addition to tumorigenic properties, numerous environmental factors, such as nutrition, chemical carcinogens, and tobacco/alcohol consumption, possess pro-invasive and pro-metastatic cancer features. In contrast to traditional cancer treatment, modern therapeutics not only take into account an individual’s genetic makeup but also consider gene–environment interactions. The current review sharpens the focus by elaborating on the impact that environmental factors have on the pathogenesis and progression of head and neck cancer and the underlying molecular mechanisms involved. Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives in this area of research are also discussed. Inhibiting key environmental drivers of tumor progression should yield survival benefits for patients at any stage of head and neck cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document