Background/ Aim. Transition from standard to highly conformal radiation
therapy techniques, requires implementation of complex advanced dosimetry.
The aim of the work was comparison of dosimetric parameters of 3DCRT and
VMAT plan, as well as complications after treatment in relation to
dosimetric parameters at gynecological cancer patients. Methods.
Forty-nine gynecological cancer patients were included in the study. All
patients were planned for 3D CRT, but due to unacceptable doses to organs at
risk, treatment plans for IMRT or VMAT were generated for 21 patients. The
patients were prescribed 50.4 Gy/28 fractions (4) and 45 Gy/25 fractions (45
patients). The coverage of PTV and doses to organs at risk were recorded.
PTV margins were evaluated for both techniques according to the Van Herk
formula. Results. ICRU 83 criteria were fulfilled in all 3DCRT /VMAT/IMRT
plans providing optimal coverage of PTV. Doses to OARS: in average, the
V45Gy in small bowel in IMRT/VMAT plans was four times smaller than the same
of 3DCRT plans. The V45Gy of small bowels was in average 49.4cm3 in
IMRT/VMAT plans, while in 3DCRT plans it was 211.6 cm3. In case of femoral
head, significant reduction in V30Gy (10.8 % vs. 33.1%) and mean dose in
case of IMRT/VMAT plans was recorded (30.4 Gy in 3DCRT vs 23.6 Gy). Rectum
was planned with significantly lower dose in terms of V30Gy (79.5% vs 95.2%)
in IMRT/VMAT plans. Bladder was better spared in VMAT plans in terms of
V40Gy (51% vs. 91%), but maximum dose was higher in VMAT plans than in 3DCRT
(50.1 Gy to 48.1 Gy in average). For all OARs there is statistically
significant difference registered at p>0.05. Toxicities recorded in VMAT and
3DCRT patients include mainly radiation induced cystitis and enteritis.
Patients treated with 3DCRT generally have longer recovery time. Homogeneity
index was 0.11 for VMAT plans and 0.09 for 3DCRT plans. Conclusions.
Analysis of dosimetric parameters revealed significant differences in normal
tissue doses for same 3DCRT and VMAT patient, which confirmed necessity for
implementation of advanced techniques for as many patients as possible.