Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) including dual energy and reconstruction of iodine maps for diagnosing CTEPH. This method for detecting embolisms and perfusion failures was compared with V/Q-SPECT. An additional purpose was to compare the applied radiation dose of both techniques.
Materials and Methods 71 patients (49 women) with suspected CTEPH were included in this prospective study. The patients received a V/Q-SPECT and a dual-energy CTPA. Iodine maps were reconstructed from the data set. CTPA and the iodine maps were read by an experienced radiologist unaware of the clinical information as well as the results of the V/Q-SPECT. Results were compared to the V/Q-SPECT. DLP and the applied amount of radionuclides (MAA, Technegas) were obtained for comparison of radiation dose.
Results For the diagnosis of CTEPH, the sensitivity of DECT was 1.000, specificity 0.966, PPV 0.867 and NPV 1.000, respectively. There was not a considerable difference in the x-ray exposure between the DECT examination and the V/Q-SPECT (1.892 mSv vs. 1.911 mSv; p = 0.6115). Both examination modalities were highly consistent regarding the classification of pathological segments (1177/1278 segments, 92,09 %, κ = 0,5938).
Conclusion This study presents the DECT, in combination with reconstructed iodine maps, as a potential alternative to the current imaging technique of first choice, V/Q-SPECT. For creating future prospective diagnostic algorithms, the implementation of DECT screening with iodine maps should be considered.
Key Points:
Citation Format
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Radiation Exposure of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) in the Course of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)
