scholarly journals Pain response after stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases – a phase II, randomized controlled trial within a prospective cohort

Author(s):  
Bart J. Pielkenrood ◽  
Joanne M. van der Velden ◽  
Yvette M. van der Linden ◽  
Marcia M T Bartels ◽  
Nicolien Kasperts ◽  
...  
Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Brian J. Schiro ◽  
Justin Sporrer ◽  
Muni Rubens ◽  
Haley R. Appel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Spine metastasis is a common occurrence in cancer patients and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with modest rates of pain relief, high rates of disease recurrence, low response rates for those with radioresistant histologies, and limited improvement in neurologic deficits. The addition of radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) to index sites together with EBRT may improve pain response rates and corresponding quality of life. Methods/design This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with spine metastasis from T5-L5, stratified according to tumor type (radioresistant vs. radiosensitive) in which patients in each stratum will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either RFA/PVA and EBRT or EBRT alone. All patients will be treated with EBRT to a dose of 20–30 Gy in 5–10 fractions. The target parameters will be measured and recorded at the baseline clinic visit, and daily at home with collection of weekly measurements at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months following treatment with imaging and QOL assessments. Discussion The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether RFA/PVA in addition to EBRT improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastasis, defined as complete or partial pain relief (measured using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale [NRPS]) at 3 months. Secondary objectives include determining whether combined modality treatment improves the rapidity of pain response, duration of pain response, patient reported pain impact, health utility, and overall QOL. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04375891. Registered on 5 May 2020.


2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marylin J. Dodd ◽  
Maria H. Cho ◽  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Patricia L. Painter ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. e2824
Author(s):  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Chang Won Hong ◽  
Byung Chang Kim ◽  
Sung Chan Park ◽  
Kyung Su Han ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmar Maciel Lima Júnior ◽  
Manoel Odorico De Moraes Filho ◽  
Bruno Almeida Costa ◽  
Andréa Vieira Pontes Rohleder ◽  
Marina Becker Sales Rocha ◽  
...  

Abstract Skin substitutes are considered a useful alternative for occlusive dressings in the treatment of superficial burns as they reduce the frequency of dressing replacement. This phase II randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) skin as an occlusive xenograft dressing for the treatment of burn wounds in humans. In order to assess the use of tilapia skin, the following variables were evaluated: number of days for wound healing, the number of times the occlusive dressing was changed, use of anesthetics or analgesics, pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale, and evaluation of burn improvement on the day of dressing removal. In total, 62 participants completed the study. It was found that in participants treated with tilapia skin, complete reepithelialization occurred in significantly fewer days; reported pain intensity was lower (study arms B and C), the amount of anesthetics/analgesics required was lower (study arms B and C), and the necessity of dressing changes was significantly reduced in comparison with volunteers treated with silver sulfadiazine. In our study, the tilapia skin xenograft showed good efficacy as an occlusive biological dressing for burn wound treatment in humans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document