scholarly journals Looping wire technique to facilitate true lumen wiring during TEVAR in type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration: A case report

Author(s):  
Suko Adiarto ◽  
Taofan Siddiq ◽  
Suci Indriani ◽  
Hananto Andriantoro ◽  
Iwan Dakota
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (34) ◽  
pp. 10689-10695
Author(s):  
Li Zhang ◽  
Wei-Kang Guan ◽  
Hua-Ping Wu ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Kai-Ping Lv ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. e180-e183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nishino ◽  
Kenji Suda ◽  
Akitaka Kuramaoto ◽  
Yoshihiro Honda ◽  
Kiyoko Takemiya ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 451.e5-451.e10
Author(s):  
Mary Lin ◽  
Alison O. Flentje ◽  
Charles Drucker ◽  
Siamak Dahi ◽  
Aakash Shah ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026765912093853
Author(s):  
Shek-yin Au ◽  
Ka-man Fong ◽  
Wing-yiu George Ng ◽  
Sheung-on So ◽  
Kit-hung Anne Leung

A case report of successful application of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with chronic type B aortic dissection and myocardial stunning to bridge to recovery was presented. Good outcomes from the application of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in aortic dissection have rarely been reported, and the considerations of starting veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in this situation were seldom discussed. The orthodox that peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an absolute contraindication for initiation of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be challenged. With proper planning and real-time transesophageal echocardiography–guided cannulation, peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is possibly beneficial. The considerations and echocardiography-guided techniques would be discussed in this report.


Vascular ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Kotelis ◽  
G Grebe ◽  
P Kraus ◽  
M Müller-Eschner ◽  
M Bischoff ◽  
...  

Aim To identify morphologic factors affecting aortic expansion in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissections. Methods Computed tomography data of 24 patients (18 male; median age: 61 years), diagnosed with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissections between 2002 and 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had at least two computed tomography angiography scans and six months of uneventful follow-up. Computed tomography scans were assessed by two independent readers with regard to presence and number of entry tears. Thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters were derived using image processing software. Results Twenty-two of 24 patients showed aortic expansion over a median computed tomography angiographic follow-up of 33.2 months. Annual rates showed an increase of 1.7 mm for total aortic diameter, 2.1 mm for the false and a decrease of −0.4 mm for the true lumen. In three patients (12.5%), aortic diameter exceeded 60 mm during follow-up, and all three patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients with a maximum aortic diameter <4 cm at baseline showed a significantly higher expansion rate compared to cases with an initial maximum aortic diameter of ≥4 cm ( p=0.0471). A median of two entries (range: 1–5) was recognized per patient. Presence of more than two entry tears ( n = 13) was associated with faster overall diameter expansion (mean annual rates: 2.18 mm vs. 1.16 mm; p = 0.4556), and decrease of the cross-sectional surface of the true lumen over time (annual rate for > 2 entries vs. ≤2 entries: −7.8 mm2 vs. +37.5 mm2; p = 0.0369). Median size of entry tears was 12 mm (range: 2–53 mm). Conclusions The results presented herein suggest that uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients with more than two entry tears and/or an initial maximum aortic diameter of<4 cm are at risk for aortic dilatation and, therefore, may require stricter follow-up including the possible need for early intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document