Interleukin-36 alpha levels are elevated in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and correlate with disease activity

Immunobiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 224 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangyang Song ◽  
Mingqin Zhu ◽  
Caiyun Liu ◽  
Chao Zheng ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Tong ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Kai Liu ◽  
Weishi Liu ◽  
Shen Li ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the factors related to the prognosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood examination. Methods: In this study, we collected 111 patients who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2016 and January 2018 and diagnosed with NMOSD. The patients were divided into the relapse group (n=48) and remission group (n=67). Before treatment, all the patients underwent a routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood test on the second morning of admission. The association between laboratory data and disease prognosis was evaluated. Results: The immunoglobulin G (IgG) level in the serum showed a strong correlation with the relapse of patients, especially in the aquaporin-4-Antibody (AQP4-Ab) positive group (p<0.01). A high level of serum IgG concentration was associated with the relapse of NMOSD, especially in the anti-AQP4 positive group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of serum IgG level was 0.888 (p0.001, 95%CI: 0.808-0.968). The ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR) was associated with the disability degree of NMOSD patients in 3 years. The NLR value was a linear correlation with final Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Patients with a high level of NLR value presented an increased degree of disability in the following three years (R2=0.053, p=0.015). Conclusion: The serum IgG level and NLR of first-attack patients were correlated with the prognosis of NMOSD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Cortese ◽  
Antonio Giorgio ◽  
Gianmarco Severa ◽  
Nicola De Stefano

Several MRI measures have been developed in the last couple of decades, providing a number of imaging biomarkers that can capture the complexity of the pathological processes occurring in multiple sclerosis (MS) brains. Such measures have provided more specific information on the heterogeneous pathologic substrate of MS-related tissue damage, being able to detect, and quantify the evolution of structural changes both within and outside focal lesions. In clinical practise, MRI is increasingly used in the MS field to help to assess patients during follow-up, guide treatment decisions and, importantly, predict the disease course. Moreover, the process of identifying new effective therapies for MS patients has been supported by the use of serial MRI examinations in order to sensitively detect the sub-clinical effects of disease-modifying treatments at an earlier stage than is possible using measures based on clinical disease activity. However, despite this has been largely demonstrated in the relapsing forms of MS, a poor understanding of the underlying pathologic mechanisms leading to either progression or tissue repair in MS as well as the lack of sensitive outcome measures for the progressive phases of the disease and repair therapies makes the development of effective treatments a big challenge. Finally, the role of MRI biomarkers in the monitoring of disease activity and the assessment of treatment response in other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte antibody disease (MOGAD) is still marginal, and advanced MRI studies have shown conflicting results. Against this background, this review focused on recently developed MRI measures, which were sensitive to pathological changes, and that could best contribute in the future to provide prognostic information and monitor patients with MS and other inflammatory demyelinating diseases, in particular, NMOSD and MOGAD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 106007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Gomez-Figueroa ◽  
Guillermo Noriega-Morales ◽  
Adriana Casallas-Vanegas ◽  
Indhira Zabala-Angeles ◽  
Christian Garcia-Estrada ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document