Does category-training facilitate 11-month-olds’ acquisition of unfamiliar category-property associations?

The article examines the definition of the term «property» in management sphere, analyses the existing definitions of the term «property» in management sphere. On this basis, the different approaches are identified and a process approach to the interpretation of a specific category is proposed. Regarding the classification of the types of property and sources of its formation, the use of terms and concepts that have expired in the legislation has been established. It is proposed to eliminate the identified differences and contradictions in the interpretation of the terms of legal regulation of property relations in management sphere in Ukraine in view of the types of property and sources of its formation. The definition of the category «property» in management sphere, which is available in current legislation and modern scientific sources, is considered. The approaches to the definition of the term «property» in management sphere are singled out, namely: property is things, assets, property of a certain type, classification-based approach and combined approach. The definition of the essence of the term «property» in management sphere is proposed to be considered according to the process approach, which is initially considered resources, which later acquire the characteristics of assets and further property. The differences and ramifications in the classification types of property under the current legislation are analysed, the ways of their elimination are offered, which will lead to the increase of efficiency of the use of the created property of the economic entity. According to the process approach, which assumes that a certain set of resources acquires the characteristics of assets, which, in turn, are part of the property of a particular entity. A distinctive feature of the proposed approach is that the property in management sphere is defined as a set of assets that are formed through a number of resources. The use of the provided proposals and elimination of identified contradictions in the classification of property types and sources of its formation will promote the intensification of various management functions of economic activity in the part of implementing economic mechanisms and regulators to optimize property formation and increase of its efficiency.

Download Full-text

The Baire Category Property and Some Notions of Compactness

Journal of the London Mathematical Society ◽

10.1112/s0024610798005675 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 57 (1) ◽

pp. 1-19 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Jules Fossy ◽

Marianne Morillon

Keyword(s):

Baire Category ◽

Category Property

Download Full-text

Ulvan polysaccharide-degrading enzymes: An updated and comprehensive review of sources category, property, structure, and applications of ulvan lyases

Algal Research ◽

10.1016/j.algal.2021.102477 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 60 ◽

pp. 102477

Author(s):

Tiancheng Tang ◽

Shengsheng Cao ◽

Benwei Zhu ◽

Qian Li

Keyword(s):

Comprehensive Review ◽

Degrading Enzymes ◽

Category Property

Download Full-text

What We Learned from Mediated Embodiment Experiments and Why It Should Matter to Policymakers

Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments ◽

10.1162/pres_a_00312 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 27 (1) ◽

pp. 63-67 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Laura Aymerich-Franch ◽

Eduard Fosch-Villaronga

Keyword(s):

Sense Of Self ◽

Legal Protection ◽

The Body ◽

Policy Implications ◽

First Person ◽

Property Damage ◽

Category Property ◽

Psychological Harm

When people embody a virtual or a robotic avatar, their sense of self extends to the body of that avatar. We argue that, as a consequence, if the avatar gets harmed, the person embodied in that avatar suffers the harm in the first person. Potential scenarios involving physical or psychological harm caused to avatars gives rise to legal, moral, and policy implications that need to be considered by policymakers. We maintain that the prevailing distinction in law between “property” and “person” categories compromises the legal protection of the embodied users. We advocate for the inclusion of robotic and virtual avatars in a double category, property–person, as the property and the person mingle in one: the avatar. This hybrid category is critical to protecting users of mediated embodiment experiences both from potential physical or psychological harm and property damage.

Download Full-text

Property, Property Solvency of Spouses and Their Joint Debts

Lex Russica ◽

10.17803/1729-5920.2021.177.8.023-032 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 23-32

Author(s):

O. Yu. Kosova

Keyword(s):

Property Rights ◽

Common Property ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

Federal Law ◽

Real Property ◽

Structural Element ◽

Scientific Publications ◽

Property Relations ◽

Legal Obligations ◽

Category Property

In the Russian legal terminology, the term "property relations" is widely used. However, the category "property" in terms of its constituent elements, due to the absence of its legal definition in the Civil and Family Codes of the Russian Federation, is explained in different scientific contexts. In theory, debts are often named as one of the elements internally forming the property, along with things and property rights, and the relations of common property of spouses are no exception. The prospect of legalization of debts as a structural element of the property of spouses is considered in the draft Federal Law No. 835938-7 that proposes to make appropriate amendments to Art. 34 of the Civil Code of the RF IC, which gives rise to a special concern in identifying the legal nature of common debts. The solution to this problem determines the need to analyze the current legislation and scientific publications devoted to property relations, property rights and its objects. Due to the fact that the debts of the spouses represent unfulfilled civil legal obligations arising from participation in relations with the third parties, their merger with family legal property relations of the spouses’ property is unacceptable. Debts do not have the qualities of objects of property rights that cumulatively form the property belonging to spouses and existing in the common property regime. Thus, it cannot be added up from an asset and a liability. Regarding legal regulation of property relations, we only can compare, on the one hand, the totality of property objects belonging to spouses on the ground of common property and, on the other hand, the objects of execution of their common obligations with respect to creditors expressed in single value units. To indicate the result of the comparison, it is advisable to use the concept of "property solvency of spouses", which allows us to assess their property status for participation in civil transactions, their real property responsibility, as well as in ensuring the interests of creditors. In support of these conclusions, the author provides detailed arguments.

Download Full-text

Property as a category of economic comparativistic

Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics ◽

10.21686/2413-2829-2019-2-57-65 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 57-65

Author(s):

M. I. Skripnikova ◽

E. V. Aleksandrova ◽

E. G. Lisovskaya

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Economic Systems ◽

Historical Approach ◽

Genetic Method ◽

Political Situation ◽

Methodological Foundation ◽

Category Property ◽

The Subject

The idea of the category ‘property’ is diverse and it is studied by economists, philosophers, lawyers, politologists and other experts. It is one of the basic categories in researching economic systems, especially economies being transformed as well as transitional ones. The subject is undoubtedly acute. Property is a category, which is filled by specific terms of different sciences, it is changeable in view of public expediency, economic and political situation and it becomes a key one in economic comparativistic. The goal of the article is to study and compare opinions of Russian and overseas scientists, academic schools and at the same time to investigate archive materials and academic works by present day academics dealing with the topic. The novelty of the article is connected with the multi-sided research of the category ‘property’. Theoretical and methodological foundation of the article was formed by principles of historism, system and comparative analysis, which support investigation of phenomena in their development and can be used with due regard to historical-retrospective and comparative-historical approach to such a phenomenon as property. On the basis of historical-genetic method it is possible to define the substantial content of the phenomenon. The authors also provide definitions of the notion ‘comparativistic’.

Download Full-text

PHENOMENOLOGY OF PROPERTY TAXATION

WORLD OF FINANCE ◽

10.35774/sf2021.01.138 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 138-148

Author(s):

Volodymyr VALIHURA

Keyword(s):

Property Rights ◽

Phenomenological Approach ◽

Social Characteristics ◽

Economic Interests ◽

Property Taxation ◽

Category Property ◽

Key Features

Introduction. The ownership encompasses the subject’s ownership of a tangible or intangible object with all the formalized or informal manifestations of the phenomenon. Therefore in the process of property taxation it is necessary to take into account all the features of ownership, to consider this process from the standpoint of imposing tax on the owner in inseparable relationship with its property, social characteristics and impact on economic interests. The purpose of the article is to scientifically substantiate the essence and determine the criteria of the phenomenological approach to the property taxation. Results. The essence of the category “property” in the reference literature is investigated, its key features are substantiated, on the basis of which the own vision of the essence of this definition is presented. The concept of “property taxation” is defined from the standpoint of taking into account the characteristics of the category “property”. Criteria for the implementation of the phenomenological approach to property taxation are proposed. Ways to minimize tax liabilities in the process of property taxation are covered. Conclusions. The concept of “property taxation”, taking into account its features and in accordance with the content of the taxation process, we have defined as the imposition of taxes on entities in the process of possession of tangible or intangible goods, acquisition of property rights and its termination.

Download Full-text

THE PROBLEM OF " PROPERTY" IN ECONOMIC THEORY

Экономическая наука сегодня ◽

10.21122/2309-6667-2019-9-34-38 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 34-38

Author(s):

S. Kuregyan

Keyword(s):

Economic Theory ◽

Intellectual Property ◽

Economic Relation ◽

Spiritual Values ◽

Modern Problem ◽

General Terms ◽

Legal Relation ◽

Material Goods ◽

Category Property

The article reveals the modern problem of "property" as an economic category. "Property" is both an economic and legal (legal) attitude. There are contradictions between the economic relation of ownership and the legal (legal) relation of ownership, often they do not coincide. Modern understanding of property cannot do without the concept of “intellectual property.” Property in general terms is not only the appropriation of material goods, but also spiritual values.

Download Full-text