High incidence of osteochondral lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced ankle fractures: Medium-term follow-up of 100 cases

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 757-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Regier ◽  
Jan Philipp Petersen ◽  
Ahmet Hamurcu ◽  
Eik Vettorazzi ◽  
Cyrus Behzadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
High Incidence

scholarly journals Timing of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Direk Tantigate ◽  
J. Turner Vosseller ◽  
Justin Greisberg ◽  
Benjamin Ascherman ◽  
Christina Freibott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Unstable ankle fractures are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for stabilization in an effort to ultimately prevent post-traumatic arthritis. It is not uncommon for operative treatment to be performed as an outpatient in the ambulatory surgery setting several days to a couple weeks after the injury to facilitate things from a scheduling perspective. It is unclear what effect this delay has on functional outcome. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of delayed operative treatment by comparing the functional outcomes for groups of patients based on the amount of time between the injury and surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 122 ankle fracture patients who were surgically treated by ORIF over a three year period was performed. All ankle fracture patients older than 18 years with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included. A total of 61 patients were included for this study. Three patients were excluded; 2 patients had an open injury and 1 patient presented with a delayed union. Demographic data, comorbidities, injury characteristics, duration from injury to surgery, operative time, length of postoperative stay, complications and functional outcomes were recorded. Functional outcome was determined by Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at the latest follow-up visit. Comparison of demographic variables and the subcategory of FAOS including symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sport activity and quality of life (QOL) was performed between patient underwent ORIF less than 14 days after injury and 14 days or greater. Results: A total of 58 patients were included in this study. Thirty-six patients (62.1%) were female. The mean age of patients was 48.14 ± 16.84 years (19-84 years). The mean follow-up time was 41.48 ± 12.25 months (24-76 months). The duration between injury and operative fixation in the two groups was 7 ± 3 days (<14 days) and 18 ± 3 days (>14 days), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic variables, comorbidities, injury characteristics, or length of operation. Each subcategory of FAOS demonstrated no statistically significant difference between these two groups. (Table 1) Additionally, further analysis for the delayed fixation more than 7 days and 10 days also revealed no significant difference of FAOS. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture more than 14 days does not significantly diminish functional outcome according to FAOS. Delay of ORIF for ankle fractures does not play a significant role in the long-term functional outcome.

scholarly journals Propensity Score–Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072096960
Author(s):  
Sebastian F. Baumbach ◽  
Marcel Urresti-Gundlach ◽  
Mareen Braunstein ◽  
Lars Borgmann ◽  
Wolfgang Böcker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Longitudinal Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the prospective, longitudinal outcome after arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF) and to compare the results with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in complex ankle fractures. Methods: Acute, closed, bimalleolar equivalent, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fractures were included. The AORIF cohort was enrolled prospectively. The ORIF group was identified from a retrospective database. The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The only difference was the additional arthroscopy in the AORIF cohort. The patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) following AORIF was assessed at 1 and 4 years of follow-up using the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Tegner activity scale (TAS). The AORIF cohort was propensity score matched (nearest-neighbor matching) to the ORIF database. The OMAS and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) were compared between the resulting groups. Nonparametric statistics were applied; values are presented as median (interquartile range). Twenty-six AORIF patients had a prospective 4-year follow-up. Results: No significant differences (1 year vs 4 years) were identified for the OMAS (90 [10] vs 90 [11]) and TAS (4 [2] vs 5 [2]). The severity of the cartilage lesions (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade <4 vs ICRS of 4) had no significant influence on the PROMs. Twenty-five patients per cohort (AORIF vs ORIF) were matched. The OMAS (90 [13] vs 75 [40]; P = .008) and FAAM Activities of Daily Living (ADL; 96 [11] vs 88 [30]; P = .034) revealed significantly better outcomes for AORIF. More patients in the AORIF cohort returned to sport (96% vs 77%; P = .035), with a higher FAAM Sports score (88 [37] vs 56 [47]; P = .008). Conclusion: AORIF for complex ankle fractures led to consistently good to excellent results. The propensity score–matched analysis revealed a significantly better outcome 4 years after surgery for AORIF compared with ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Timing of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Direk Tantigate ◽  
Gavin Ho ◽  
Joshua Kirschenbaum ◽  
Henrik Bäcker ◽  
Benjamin Asherman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽  
Injury Characteristics ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Unstable ankle fractures are treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to prevent posttraumatic arthritis. Typically, ORIF is performed as an ambulatory surgery several days to a few weeks after injury. It is unclear what effect this delay may have on functional outcome. This study aimed to assess the effect of timing of ankle ORIF on wound complications and functional outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of 121 patients who underwent ankle ORIF was performed. A total of 58 patients had a follow-up of at least 24 months. Time between injury and surgery greater than 14 days was defined as “delayed.” Demographic variables, injury characteristics, length of surgery, and postoperative stay were documented. Comparison of demographic variables, wound complications, and functional outcome determined by Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) was performed. Results. 118 patients were included. The duration between injury and surgery was 6 days in the “early” group and 19 days in the “delayed” group. There were no significant differences in demographic variables, injury characteristics, and length of surgery between the groups. Wound complications in the early and delayed groups were 5% and 11.8%, although this difference was not statistically significant. Among 58 patients who had a follow-up of at least 24 months, the median follow-up time was 38 (range, 24-76) months. Each subscale of FAOS demonstrated no significant difference. Conclusion. Ankle ORIF more than 14 days after injury did not significantly increase the rate of wound complication, nor did it impair ultimate functional outcome in this group. Levels of Evidence: Level III

scholarly journals Postoperative Complications Following Ankle Fractures in the Geriatric Population: A Case Series

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0009
Author(s):  
Matthew Anderson ◽  
Aaradhana J. Jha ◽  
Sameer M. Naranje ◽  
Gean C. Viner ◽  
Haley McKissack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Illicit Drugs ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Increased Risk

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are among the most common orthopedic injuries. While open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the standard treatment for displaced ankle fractures in younger patients, there is controversy regarding the optimal management of these injuries among geriatric patients due to the high prevalence of comorbidities. Closed manipulation leads to poor long-term functional outcomes, with high rates of malunion and non-union in all populations as well as higher mortality in patients over 65 years of age. However, surgical management in the elderly carries rates of complications as high as 20-40%. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors for healing complications following ORIF of ankle fractures in patients greater than 75 years of age. Methods: All patients 75 years of age and older undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures at a single institution from 2008 to 2018 were identified. Patients with polytrauma and/or pilon fractures were excluded. Patient medical records were reviewed to obtain information regarding details about the injury, surgery, and follow-up as well as patient demographics and comorbidities. Radiographs from post-operative clinic visits were examined by a foot and ankle certified orthopedic fellow for each patient and the time for complete union was recorded as well as any delayed union or malunion. Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare post-operative complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, revision surgery, and malunion/nonunion) among those with and without specific comorbidities. Results: Patients with other comorbidities had a statistically significant increased risk of revision surgery (p<0.0001). Additionally, those who used illicit drugs had statistically significant increased risk of sepsis (0.0213). Revision surgeries included syndesmotic screw removal, a standard procedure which does not necessarily imply presence of complication. Conclusion: Elderly patients are susceptible to various postoperative complications. Substance abuse is associated with revision surgery, while the presence of other comorbidities collectively is associated with sepsis. To optimize postoperative management, surgeons should be aware of patient comorbidities and exceptionally attentive at follow-up examinations for these patients.

Acute Dorsal Trans-Scaphoid Perilunate Fracture-Dislocations: Medium-Term Results

2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 498-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. HERZBERG ◽  
D. FORISSIER
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Avascular Necrosis ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Dorsal Approach ◽  
Mayo Wrist Score ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

The purpose of this study was to investigate the medium-term results (mean follow-up, 8 years) of a series of 14 trans-scaphoid dorsal perilunate fracture-dislocations treated operatively at an average of 6 days following injury. Eleven underwent open reduction and internal fixation through a dorsal approach. Combined palmar and dorsal approaches were used in only three cases, for open reduction and internal fixation in two and proximal row carpectomy in one. The Mayo wrist score revealed five excellent, three good, five fair and one poor result. The average score was 79% (range 55–95%). All internally fixed scaphoids healed and no lunate or scaphoid fragment avascular necrosis with collapse was observed. Carpal alignment was satisfactory in most cases. Posttraumatic radiological midcarpal and/or radiocarpal arthritis were almost always observed at follow-up, but this did not correlate with the Mayo wrist score.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document