Source Retrieval Model Focused on Aggregation for plagiarism detection

2019 ◽  
Vol 503 ◽  
pp. 336-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei-lei Kong ◽  
Zhong-yuan Han ◽  
Hao-liang Qi ◽  
Mu-yun Yang
2017 ◽  
Vol E100.D (1) ◽  
pp. 203-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leilei KONG ◽  
Zhimao LU ◽  
Zhongyuan HAN ◽  
Haoliang QI

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18
Author(s):  
Gints Jēkabsons

AbstractDetection of local text reuse is central to a variety of applications, including plagiarism detection, origin detection, and information flow analysis. This paper evaluates and compares effectiveness of fingerprint selection algorithms for the source retrieval stage of local text reuse detection. In total, six algorithms are compared – Every p-th, 0 mod p, Winnowing, Hailstorm, Frequency-biased Winnowing (FBW), as well as the proposed modified version of FBW (MFBW).Most of the previously published studies in local text reuse detection are based on datasets having either artificially generated, long-sized, or unobfuscated text reuse. In this study, to evaluate performance of the algorithms, a new dataset has been built containing real text reuse cases from Bachelor and Master Theses (written in English in the field of computer science) where about half of the cases involve less than 1 % of document text while about two-thirds of the cases involve paraphrasing.In the performed experiments, the overall best detection quality is reached by Winnowing, 0 mod p, and MFBW. The proposed MFBW algorithm is a considerable improvement over FBW and becomes one of the best performing algorithms.The software developed for this study is freely available at the author’s website http://www.cs.rtu.lv/jekabsons/.


2020 ◽  
Vol 890 (2) ◽  
pp. 174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kitzmann ◽  
Kevin Heng ◽  
Maria Oreshenko ◽  
Simon L. Grimm ◽  
Dániel Apai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 988-997
Author(s):  
Sylvia Putri Gunawan ◽  
Lucia Dwi Krisnawati ◽  
Antonius Rachmat Chrismanto

Two different paradigms in the field of plagiarism detection resulting in External Plagiarism Detection (EPD) and Intrinsic Plagiarism Detection (IPD) systems. The most common applied system is EPD, which requires its algorithm to make a heuristic comparison between a suspicious document with documents in a corpus. In contrast, given a suspicious document only, an algorithm of IPD should be able to find the plagiarism section by looking for text segments having different writing styles. Previous researches for Indonesian texts fell only in the field of the EPD development system. Therefore, this research focuses on and contributes to experimenting and analyzing the stylometric features and segmentation strategies to build an IPD system for Indonesian texts. The experimentation results show that the paragraph segment performs better by scoring 0.92 for Macro Averaged-Accuracy and 0.54 for Macro Averaged-F1. The stylometric features achieving the highest scores of F-1 and Accuracy are the frequency of punctuation, the average paragraph length, and the type-token ratio.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document