Experiments and Finite Element Analysis of GFRP Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Rectangular Columns Subjected to Concentric and Eccentric Axial Loading

Structures ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 273-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Elchalakani ◽  
Ali Karrech ◽  
Minhao Dong ◽  
M.S. Mohamed Ali ◽  
Bo Yang
2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J Hardy ◽  
M. K Pipelzadeh ◽  
A. R Gowhari-Anaraki

This paper discusses the behaviour of hollow tubes with axisymmetric internal projections subjected to combined axial and internal pressure loading. Predictions from an extensive elastic and elastic-plastic finite element analysis are presented for a typical geometry and a range of loading combinations, using a simplified bilinear elastic-perfectly plastic material model. The axial loading case, previously analysed, is extended to cover the additional effect of internal pressure. All the predicted stress and strain data are found to depend on the applied loading conditions. The results are normalized with respect to material properties and can therefore be applied to geometrically similar components made from other materials, which can be represented by the same material models.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan-Wei Zhang ◽  
Liang-Yu Xiong ◽  
Zu-Tai Huang ◽  
Xin Xiao ◽  
Su-Li Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract The authors have withdrawn this preprint due to author disagreement.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Abid ◽  
Abdul W. Awan

A number of analytical and experimental studies have been conducted to study ‘strength’ and ‘sealing capability’ of bolted flange joint only under internal pressure loading. Due to the ignorance of the external i.e. axial loading, the optimized performance of the bolted flange joint can not be achieved. A very limited work is found in literature under combined internal pressure and axial loading. In addition, the present design codes do not address the effects of axial loading on the structural integrity and sealing ability of the flange joints. From previous studies, non-gasketed joint is claimed to have better performance as compared to conventional gasketed joint. To investigate non-gasketed joint’s performance i.e. joint strength and sealing capability under combined internal pressure and any applied external loading, an extensive 3D nonlinear finite element analysis is carried out and overall joint performance and behavior is discussed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K. Lee ◽  
E.C. Teo ◽  
F.K. Fuss ◽  
V. Vanneuville ◽  
T.X. Qiu ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 847-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Barbier ◽  
J. Vander Sloten ◽  
G. Krzesinski ◽  
E. Schepers &G. Van Der Perre

1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Hardy ◽  
M K Pipelzadeh

This paper describes the results of a study of the elastic–plastic behaviour of short flat bars with projections subjected to monotonic and cyclic axial loading using finite element analysis. The results are complementary to similar results for (a) shear loading and (b) combined axial and shear loading. Six geometries are considered and elastic–plastic stress and strain data for both local and remote restraints are presented. These geometries and associated restraints result in elastic stress concentration factors in the range 1.69–4.96. A simple bilinear elastic–plastic material model is assumed and the results are normalized with respect to material properties so that they can be applied to geometrically similar components made from other materials which can be represented by the same material models.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 6635
Author(s):  
Monica A. Fernandez ◽  
N. Subramanian ◽  
M. Nawrocki ◽  
A. Nawrocki ◽  
J. Craighead ◽  
...  

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine stress levels on supporting structures of implant-retained overdentures as a function of varying degrees of palatal coverage using finite element analysis modeling at different loading angles. Materials and Methods: ABAQUS®-software was used to perform finite element analysis on eight overdenture models with three and four implants and with and without palatal coverage designs. Loads were applied perpendicular and 45º to the implants. Von Mises stress was measured to determine bone stress. A one-way ANOVA determined which model caused the most stress to the maxillary bone. Results: Palatal coverage increased stress to anterior implant in three implant (p = 0.08) models but decreased stress to all implants in four implant models (p = 0.43). Distal implants received more stress than anterior implants for all models. There was no significant difference between a full palate and no palate coverage overdenture prosthesis when a bar was added under axial loading (p = 0.954). Under non-axial loading, a decrease in stress was noted with the bar in all areas except the anterior implant site. Conclusions: Palatal coverage may not be necessary when applying a pure axial load. The addition of a bar decreased stress at loading.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document