31.3 GROUP WELL-CHILD CARE MODEL FOR LATINO CHILDREN IN IMMIGRANT FAMILIES: ADAPTING TO AND LEARNING FROM THE COVID-19 CONTEXT

Author(s):  
Rheanna Platt
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 215013271987673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Desai ◽  
Futu Chen ◽  
Renée Boynton-Jarrett

Introduction: Group-based models for well-child care have been shown to positively affect patient experience. One promising group well-child care model is CenteringParenting. However, clinician self-efficacy with delivery of the model is unknown and clinician satisfaction with the model has been understudied. Objectives: To investigate sense of self-efficacy, degree of satisfaction, and comfort with trauma-informed care (TIC) among diverse clinical providers implementing the CenteringParenting curriculum. We also examined the relationship between self-efficacy, satisfaction, and comfort with TIC, and delivery of the model. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to CenteringParenting providers (N = 98) from 49 clinics. Providers (N = 41) from 24 clinical sites completed the survey, corresponding to a 42% individual and 49% site response rate. Surveys explored provider: satisfaction with the curriculum, perceived self-efficacy, and perspective on competency with TIC. Results: Providers indicated that the CenteringParenting model achieves each of its four objectives (means ranged from 4.10 to 4.52 for each objective, with 5 being the highest possible response). Providers rated their level of satisfaction (scale of 1 [unsatisfied] to 5 [very satisfied]) with their ability to address patient concerns higher with CenteringParenting in the group care setting (mean = 4.10) than in the individual care setting (mean = 3.55). Respondents demonstrated a high mean average Self-Efficacy in Group Care score of 93.63 (out of 110). Unadjusted logistical regression analyses demonstrated that higher provider Self-Efficacy in Group Care score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08) and higher comfort with TIC (OR = 22.16) is associated with curriculum content being discussed with a facilitative approach. Conclusions: Providers from diverse clinical sites report high satisfaction with and self-efficacy in implementing the CenteringParenting model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Kara S. Koschmann ◽  
Cynthia J. Peden-McAlpine ◽  
Mary Chesney ◽  
Susan M. Mason ◽  
Mary C. Hooke

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 898-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Fiks ◽  
K. F. Hunter ◽  
A. R. Localio ◽  
R. W. Grundmeier ◽  
E. A. Alessandrini
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Suzanne Friedman ◽  
Bianca Calderon ◽  
Amanda Gonzalez ◽  
Caitlyn Suruki ◽  
Ashley Blanchard ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal Halfon ◽  
Paul W. Newacheck ◽  
David L. Wood ◽  
Robert F. St Peter

Background. The use of the emergency departments as a regular source of sick care has been increasing, despite the fact that it is costly and is often an inappropriate source of care. This study examines factors associated with routine use of emergency departments by using a national sample of US children. Methods. Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Child Health, a nationally representative sample of 17 710 children younger than 18 years, was linked to county-level health resource data from the Area Resource File. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between children's use of emergency departments as their usual sources of sick care and predisposing need and enabling characteristics of the families, as well as availability of health resources in their communities. Results. In 1988 3.4% or approximately 2 million US children younger than 18 years were reported to use emergency departments as their usual sources of sick care. Significant demographic risk factors for reporting an emergency department as a usual source of sick care included black versus white race (odds ratio [OR], 2.08), single-parent versus two-parent families (OR, 1.53), mothers with less than a high school education versus those with high school or more (OR, 1.76), poor versus nonpoor families (OR, 1.76), and living in an urban versus suburban setting (OR, 1.38). Specific indicators of need, such as recurrent health conditions (asthma, tonsillitis, headaches, and febrile seizures), were not associated with routine use of emergency departments for sick care. Furthermore, health insurance status and specifically Medicaid coverage had no association with use of the emergency department as a usual source of sick care. Compared with children who receive well child care in private physicians' offices or health maintenance organizations, children whose sources of well child care were neighborhood health centers were more likely to report emergency departments for sick care (OR, 2.01). Children residing in counties where the supply of primary care physicians was in the top quintile had half the odds (OR, 0.50) of reporting emergency departments as usual sources of sick care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document