Long term data for low-energy intense pulsed light for hair removal at home

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. AB171
Keyword(s):  
Low Energy ◽  
Intense Pulsed Light ◽  
Hair Removal ◽  
Pulsed Light ◽  
Term Data ◽  
At Home

Long-Term Epilation Using the EpiLight Broad Band, Intense Pulsed Light Hair Removal System

1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 909-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL H. GOLD ◽  
MICHAEL W. BELL ◽  
TERESA D. FOSTER ◽  
SHERRI STREET
Keyword(s):  
Broad Band ◽  
Intense Pulsed Light ◽  
Hair Removal ◽  
Pulsed Light ◽  
Removal System

One-year follow-up using an intense pulsed light source for long-term hair removal

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H Gold ◽  
Michael W Bell ◽  
Teresa D Foster ◽  
Sherri Street
Keyword(s):  
Light Source ◽  
Intense Pulsed Light ◽  
Hair Removal ◽  
Pulsed Light ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO INTENSE PULSED LIGHT DEVICES USED FOR PHOTOEPILATION

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Honório Sampaio Menezes ◽  
Roberto Chacur ◽  
Simone Merceo Bacchi Cirino ◽  
Miguel D'Avilla Sobrinho ◽  
Nívea Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Intense Pulsed Light ◽  
Hair Removal ◽  
Pulsed Light ◽  
Hair Density ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Scores ◽  
End Of Treatment

Background: Unwanted hair growth is a common aesthetic problem. Intense pulsed light hair removal has emerged as a leading treatment option for long-term depilation. Material and methods: Patients with phototypes I to III (n = 800) were subjected to 4 regular sessions (n=3200) of intense pulsed light, with 2 months follow-up at the end of treatment. Two devices (Silk'n, and Rejuvene) were analyzed about adverse effects and satisfaction. Observation and results: This study of 3.200 ILP sessions did not show any serious side effects and the number of side effects was minimal (8.75% to 10.5%). Patient satisfaction was over 90%. Both devices provided a similar and signicant reduction in hair density. Conclusions: Both tested sources proved its safety and efcacy for hair removal. Patient satisfaction scores were in agreement with the treatment efcacy. The incidence of side effects has no difference between devices. Axillary bromhidrosis was an unexpected side effect.

Intense Pulsed Light Hair Removal in a Patient with Congenital Hypertrichosis Terminalis

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABEER ATTIA ◽  
AMR El NOURY ◽  
MAMDOUH ABD ALHAFEZ
Keyword(s):  
Intense Pulsed Light ◽  
Hair Removal ◽  
Pulsed Light
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document