scholarly journals Development of a Germ-Free Murine Model for Prediction of Food Allergen Potency: Preliminary Studies Using Peanut Ara h1 and Ara h2 As Model Food Allergens

2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. AB406
Author(s):  
Nathan L. Marsteller ◽  
Kwame Andoh-Kumi ◽  
Stef J. Koppelman ◽  
Richard E. Goodman ◽  
Joe L. Baumert
2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 442-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Abbott ◽  
Stephen Hayward ◽  
William Ross ◽  
Samuel Benrejeb Godefroy ◽  
Franz Ulberth ◽  
...  

Abstract This document provides supplemental guidance on specifications for the development and implementation of studies to validate the performance characteristics of quantitative ELISA methods for the determination of food allergens. It is intended as a companion document to other existing publications on method validation. The guidance is divided into two sections: information to be provided by the method developer on various characteristics of the method, and implementation of a multilaboratory validation study. Certain criteria included in the guidance are allergen-specific. Two food allergens, egg and milk, are used to demonstrate the criteria guidance. These recommendations will be the basis of the harmonized validation protocol for any food allergen ELISA method, whether proprietary or nonproprietary, that will be submitted to AOAC and/or regulatory authorities or other bodies for status recognition. Regulatory authorities may have their own particular requirements for data packages in addition to the guidance in this document. Future work planned for the implementation and validation of this guidance will include guidance specific to other priority allergens.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0234899
Author(s):  
Eric A. E. Garber ◽  
Chung Y. Cho ◽  
Prasad Rallabhandi ◽  
William L. Nowatzke ◽  
Kerry G. Oliver ◽  
...  

Food Control ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 107554
Author(s):  
Vipa Surojanametakul ◽  
Sirinrat Srikulnath ◽  
Pailin Chamnansin ◽  
Haruki Shibata ◽  
Masahiro Shoji

2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 434-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Diaz-Amigo ◽  
Bert Popping

Abstract Food allergen labeling regulations have been implemented in several countries since 2006. Currently, experts are still discussing the introduction of thresholds or action levels, which should lead to the reduction of the widespread use of advisory statements (e.g., may contain) for the benefit of the allergic consumer. However, the establishment of threshold requires supporting analytical methodologies to enforce and comply with the regulations. This article discusses the possibilities and limitations of existing and emerging methodologies for the purpose of enabling compliance with and enforcement of allergen action levels.


2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
PRASAD RALLABHANDI ◽  
CHUNG Y. CHO ◽  
WILLIAM L. NOWATZKE ◽  
KERRY G. OLIVER ◽  
ERIC A. E. GARBER

ABSTRACT The xMAP food allergen detection assay (xMAP FADA) can simultaneously detect 15 analytes (14 food allergens plus gluten) in one analysis. The xMAP FADA typically employs two antibody bead sets per analyte, providing built-in confirmation that is not available with other antibody-based assays. Before an analytical method can be used, its reliability must be assessed when conditions of the assay procedure are altered. This study was conducted to determine the effects on assay performance associated with changes in incubation temperature, amounts of the antibody bead cocktail, and concentrations of detection antibody and β-mercaptoethanol in the reduced-denatured extraction buffer. The analysis of buffered-detergent extracts revealed lower responses at 22°C than at 37°C, but temperature had no effect on the analysis of reduced-denatured extracts. Changes in β-mercaptoethanol and detection antibody concentrations had an effect on the detection of only milk in the reduced-denatured extracts. A slight change in the measured bead count was observed when one-fourth of the bead cocktail was used, and a large decrease in the bead count was noted when one-eighth of the recommended amount was used, but this number (≥25) was still sufficient to provide reliable results. Overall, the xMAP FADA was very robust to changes in the assay procedure, which may inadvertently occur. HIGHLIGHTS


2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Popping ◽  
Laura Allred ◽  
François Bourdichon ◽  
Kurt Brunner ◽  
Carmen Diaz-Amigo ◽  
...  

Abstract Until recently, analytical tests for food were performed primarily in laboratories, but technical developments now enable consumers to use devices to test their food at home or when dining out. Current consumer devices for food can determine nutritional values, freshness, and, most recently, the presence of food allergens and substances that cause food intolerances. The demand for such products is driven by an increase in the incidence of food allergies, as well as consumer desire for more information about what is in their food. The number and complexity of food matrixes creates an important need for properly validated testing devices with comprehensive user instructions (definitions of technical terms can be found in ISO 5725-1:1994 and the International Vocabulary of Metrology). This is especially important with food allergen determinations that can have life-threatening consequences. Stakeholders—including food regulators, food producers, and food testing kit and equipment manufacturers, as well as representatives from consumer advocacy groups—have worked to outline voluntary guidelines for consumer food allergen- and gluten-testing devices. These guidelines cover areas such as kit validation, user sampling instructions, kit performance, and interpretation of results. The recommendations are based on (1) current known technologies, (2) analytical expertise, and (3) standardized AOAC INTERNATIONAL allergen community guidance and best practices on the analysis of food allergens and gluten. The present guidance document is the first in a series of papers intended to provide general guidelines applicable to consumer devices for all food analytes. Future publications will give specific guidance and validation protocols for devices designed to detect individual allergens and gluten, as statistical analysis and review of any validation data, preferably from an independent third party, are necessary to establish a device’s fitness-for-purpose. Following the recommendations of these guidance documents will help ensure that consumers are equipped with sufficient information to make an informed decision based on an analytical result from a consumer device. However, the present guidance document emphasizes that consumer devices should not be used in isolation to make a determination as to whether a food is safe to eat. As advances are made in science and technology, these recommendations will be reevaluated and revised as appropriate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document