Perceived Risk of Harm Mediates the Effects of Primary Care Alcohol Use Screening and Brief Advice in Adolescents

Author(s):  
Himani Byregowda ◽  
Amy L. Flynn ◽  
John R. Knight ◽  
Sion K. Harris
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-478
Author(s):  
Megan Freund ◽  
Breanne Hobden ◽  
Simon Deeming ◽  
Natasha Noble ◽  
Jamie Bryant ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The detection of harmful alcohol use and the delivery of brief advice in primary care are less than optimal. Given limited health care resources, deciding where best to allocate funding to optimize health outcomes is imperative. A simple data-based tool could be useful when access to specialist health economic advice is unavailable. This study aimed to examine the utility of a simple data-based calculator to facilitate priority setting in general practice for reducing alcohol-related harm. Methods A simple algorithm was developed within Microsoft Excel to allow comparison of hypothetical intervention scenarios that aimed to increase detection and brief advice for harmful alcohol use in general practice. The calculator accommodated varying implementation costs, size of effect and reach for each scenario created. The incremental costs of the intervention scenarios, the incremental number of successes (i.e. abstinence or drinking at safe levels) and the incremental costs-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated for each hypothetical scenario and compared with a usual care scenario. Results In the hypothetical scenarios modelled, increasing both the detection of harmful alcohol consumption and the provision of brief advice produced the greatest number of incremental successes above baseline. Increasing detection alone produced fewer incremental successes but was the most cost-effective approach, as indicated by the lowest ICER. Discussion The data-based calculator provides a simple method of exploring reach and cost-effectiveness outcomes without the need for any specific skills. Although this approach has limitations, the calculator can be used by decision makers to guide intervention planning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 177 (10) ◽  
pp. 1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Watkins ◽  
Allison J. Ober ◽  
Karen Lamp ◽  
Mimi Lind ◽  
Claude Setodji ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 332 (7540) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Coulton ◽  
Colin Drummond ◽  
Darren James ◽  
Christine Godfrey ◽  
J Martin Bland ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R Holt ◽  
David A Fiellin

Unhealthy alcohol use represents the fifth leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, and the first leading cause among persons 18 to 45 years of age. Despite the global impact of unhealthy alcohol use, the adoption of evidence-based treatments has been sluggish. Behavioral strategies for lower level drinking include the brief motivational interview, designed to be within the scope of any healthcare provider, and more specialist-driven approaches for those with alcohol use disorder (AUD) such as cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational enhancement therapy. Benzodiazepines remain the mainstay treatment for inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment, whereas other medications have similar efficacy in managing patients in the outpatient setting with milder forms of withdrawal. For maintenance treatment of AUD, four FDA-approved medications exist, with efficacy in treating AUD, as well as several non–FDA-approved medications that have been found to be effective in promoting abstinence and reducing drinking. The use of medication to treat many patients with AUD falls within the scope of primary care providers. This review contains 6 tables and 54 references. Key Words: addiction, alcohol, counseling, drinking, pharmacotherapy, primary care, psychotherapy, relapse, treatment


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document