Identification of Predictors of Recurrence in Patients with Lower Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Direct Comparison of Short-Course and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e107-e108
Author(s):  
Yuji Toiyama ◽  
Akira Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshinaga Okugawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujikawa ◽  
Junichiro Hiro ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e93-e99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisette M. Wiltink ◽  
Remi A. Nout ◽  
Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp ◽  
Heleen M. Ceha ◽  
Marta Fiocco ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
pp. 408-443
Author(s):  
Regina Beets-Tan ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Lars Påhlman

In rectal cancer treatment, surgery is most important. Dissection outside the mesorectal fascia, total mesorectal excision is required for cure in most cases; a local procedure is possible in the earliest tumours. Appropriate staging is required prior to treatment decision to stratify patients into risk groups. In early tumours surgery alone is sufficient whereas in intermediate cancers local recurrence rates are too high and preoperative radiotherapy is indicated. A short-course schedule is convenient, low toxic, although some prefer long-course chemoradiotherapy. The addition of a fluoropyrimidine enhances the radiotherapy. In locally advanced tumours preoperative chemoradiotherapy is required. The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer is controversial, particularly if preoperative chemoradiotherapy was used. Palliative chemotherapy prolongs life and improves well-being in patients with metastatic disease. Targeted drugs further improves the results to some extent. In some patients, chemotherapy may convert non-readily resectable metastases to resectable, and result in long-term cure.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv199
Author(s):  
I. Shchepotin ◽  
O.O. Kolesnik ◽  
V.I. Ivankova ◽  
O.Y. Stolyarova ◽  
A.P. Beznosenko ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1223-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce D. Minsky ◽  
Claus Rödel ◽  
Vincenzo Valentini

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (31) ◽  
pp. 3827-3833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Y. Ngan ◽  
Bryan Burmeister ◽  
Richard J. Fisher ◽  
Michael Solomon ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the local recurrence (LR) rate between short-course (SC) and long-course (LC) neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had ultrasound- or magnetic resonance imaging–staged T3N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from anal verge. SC consisted of pelvic radiotherapy 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week, early surgery, and six courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. LC was 50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction, in 5.5 weeks, with continuous infusional fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 per day, surgery in 4 to 6 weeks, and four courses of chemotherapy. Results Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomly assigned; 163 patients to SC and 163 to LC. Median potential follow-up time was 5.9 years (range, 3.0 to 7.8 years). Three-year LR rates (cumulative incidence) were 7.5% for SC and 4.4% for LC (difference, 3.1%; 95% CI, −2.1 to 8.3; P = .24). For distal tumors (< 5 cm), six of 48 SC patients and one of 31 LC patients experienced local recurrence (P = .21). Five-year distant recurrence rates were 27% for SC and 30% for LC (log-rank P = 0.92; hazard ratio [HR] for LC:SC, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.56). Overall survival rates at 5 years were 74% for SC and 70% for LC (log-rank P = 0.62; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.67). Late toxicity rates were not substantially different (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer G3-4: SC, 5.8%; LC, 8.2%; P = .53). Conclusion Three-year LR rates between SC and LC were not statistically significantly different; the CI for the difference is consistent with either no clinically important difference or differences in favor of LC. LC may be more effective in reducing LR for distal tumors. No differences in rates of distant recurrence, relapse-free survival, overall survival, or late toxicity were detected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document