Value Analysis of Central Line Simulation-Based Education

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e204
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Iglesias ◽  
Taylor Williams ◽  
Christian Sommerhalder ◽  
Clifford Snyder ◽  
Alexander Perez
2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Iglesias ◽  
Taylor P. Williams ◽  
Clifford L. Snyder ◽  
Christian Sommerhalder ◽  
Alexander Perez

Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are preventable complications that pose a significant health risk to patients and place a financial burden on hospitals. Central line simulation-based education (SBE) efforts vary widely in the literature. The aim of this study was to perform a value analysis of published central line SBE and develop a refined method of studying central line SBE. Methods A database search of PubMed Central and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) was performed for articles mentioning “Cost and CLABSI,” “Cost and Central line Associated Bloodstream Infections,” and “Cost and Central Line” in their abstract and article body. Articles chosen for qualitative synthesis mentioned “simulation” in their abstract and article body and were analyzed based on the following criteria: infection rate before vs. after SBE, cost of simulation, SBE design including simulator model used, and learner analysis. Results Of 215 articles identified, 23 were analyzed, 10 (43.48%) discussed cost of central line simulation with varying criteria for cost reporting, 8 (34.8%) numerically discussed central line complication rates (7 CLABSIs and 1 pneumothorax), and only 3 (13%) discussed both (Figure). Only 1 addressed the true cost of simulation (including space rental, equipment startup costs, and faculty salary) and its longitudinal effect on CLABSIs. Conclusion Current literature on central line SBE efforts lacks value propositions. Due to the lack of value-based data in the area of central line SBE, the authors propose a cost reporting standard for use by future studies reporting central line SBE costs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e83-e87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna Page ◽  
Maureen Tremblay ◽  
Cate Nicholas ◽  
Ted A. James

A targeted educational intervention using a simulated central line care model improved competence in central line care and resulted in decreased CLABSI rates for oncology inpatients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Grudziak ◽  
Blair Herndon ◽  
Ria D. Dancel ◽  
Harendra Arora ◽  
Christopher J. Tignanelli ◽  
...  

Central line placement is a common procedure, routinely performed by junior residents in medical and surgical departments. Before this project, no standardized instructional course on the insertion of central lines existed at our institution, and few interns had received formal ultrasound training. Interns from five departments participated in a simulation-based central line insertion course. Intern familiarity with the procedure and with ultrasound, as well as their prior experience with line placement and their level of comfort, was assessed. Of the 99 interns in participating departments, 45 per cent had been trained as ofOctober 2015. Forty-one per cent were female. The majority (59.5%) had no prior formal ultrasound training, and 46.0 per cent had never placed a line as primary operator. Scores increased significantly, from a precourse score mean of 13.7 to a postcourse score mean of 16.1, P < 0.001. All three of the self-reported measures of comfort with ultrasound also improved significantly. All interns reported the course was “very much” helpful, and 100 per cent reported they felt “somewhat” or “much” more comfortable with the procedure after attendance. To our knowledge, this is the first hospital-wide, standardized, simulation-based central line insertion course in the United States. Preliminary results indicate overwhelming satisfaction with the course, better ultrasound preparedness, and improved comfort with central line insertion.


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey H. Barsuk ◽  
Elaine R. Cohen ◽  
Anessa Mikolajczak ◽  
Stephanie Seburn ◽  
Maureen Slade ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 238212051668482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serkan Toy ◽  
Robert SF McKay ◽  
James L Walker ◽  
Scott Johnson ◽  
Jacob L Arnett

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a learner-centered, simulation-based training developed to help medical students improve their procedural skills in intubation, arterial line placement, lumbar puncture, and central line insertion. Method: The study participants were second and third year medical students. Anesthesiology residents provided the training and evaluated students’ procedural skills. Two residents were present at each station to train the medical students who rotated through all 4 stations. Pre/posttraining assessment of confidence, knowledge, and procedural skills was done using a survey, a multiple-choice test, and procedural checklists, respectively. Results: In total, 24 students were trained in six 4-hour sessions. Students reported feeling significantly more confident, after training, in performing all 4 procedures on a real patient ( P < .001). Paired-samples t tests indicated statistically significant improvement in knowledge scores for intubation, t(23) = −2.92, P < .001, and arterial line placement, t(23) = −2.75, P < .001. Procedural performance scores for intubation ( t(23) = −17.29, P < .001), arterial line placement ( t(23) = −19.75, P < .001), lumbar puncture ( t(23) = −16.27, P < .001), and central line placement ( t(23) = −17.25, P < .001) showed significant improvement. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated high reliability in checklist scores for all procedures. Conclusions: The simulation sessions allowed each medical student to receive individual attention from 2 residents for each procedure. Students’ written comments indicated that this training modality was well received. Results showed that medical students improved their self-confidence, knowledge, and skills in the aforementioned procedures.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
pp. 1050-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Dong ◽  
Harpreet S. Suri ◽  
David A. Cook ◽  
Kianoush B. Kashani ◽  
John J. Mullon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document