scholarly journals Comparison of Common Minimally Invasive Operations Using Patient Safety Indicators (PSI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e98
Author(s):  
Amalia Stefanou ◽  
Camden W. Gardner ◽  
Ilan S. Rubinfeld
2020 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 106043
Author(s):  
Paul R. Clark ◽  
Robert J. Dambrino ◽  
Sean M. Himel ◽  
Zachary S. Smalley ◽  
Wondwosen K. Yimer ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahi M Al-Tehewy ◽  
Sara E. M Abd AlRazak ◽  
Maha M Wahdan ◽  
Tamer S. F Hikal

Abstract Background Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) were developed as a tool for hospitals to identify potentially preventable complications and improve patient safety performance. Aim the study aimed to measure the association between the AHRQ patient safety indicator PSI9 (Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma) and the clinical outcome including death, readmission within 30 days and length of stay at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital Ain Shams University. Methods exploratory prospective cohort study was conducted to follow up patients from admission till 1 month after discharge at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital who fulfills the inclusion criteria. Data were collected for 330 patients through basic information sheet and follow-up sheet. Results the incidence rate of PSI9 was 49.54 per 1000 discharges. Demographic data was not significantly associated with increased incidence of PSI9. The risk of development of PSI9 was significantly higher in patients admitted directly to ICU [relative risk (RR) =5.6]. The risk of death and readmission was higher in cases developed PSI9 than the cases without PSI9 [RR = 2.40 (0.60-9.55) and 2.43 (0.636 - 9.48) respectively]. Conclusion high incidence rate of PSI9 and the incidence is higher in male gender and 60 years old and more patients. Those patients developed PSI9 were at high risk for readmission and death. Recommendations the hospital administration should consider strategies and policies to decrease the rate of PSI9 and subsequent unfavorable clinical outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon P. Rodrigues ◽  
Aurystella M. Wever ◽  
Jenny Dankelman ◽  
Frank W. Jansen

Author(s):  
Thomas W. Cutter

As minimally invasive techniques in radiology suites become more common, the need for anesthesia support will increase. While recognizing and addressing a patient’s comorbidities and other concerns are similar to what is already done in the surgical setting, the additional requirements and constraints of the imaging environment and the procedure are unique and call for specific solutions. Just as in the operating room, there is frequently no single best anesthetic technique for a given procedure. The anesthetic should be aligned with the demands of the procedure and the skill sets of the providers. Patient safety always takes precedence, and the location should never be permitted to compromise care.


1995 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. P104-P104
Author(s):  
Jacques Magnan ◽  
Gerald O'donoghue

Educational objectives: To understand the rationale behind minimally invasive posterior fossa surgery, and to describe techniques, among them neuroendoscopy, that enable minimally invasive surgery to be undertaken, emphasizing patient safety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document