e19016 Background: Perianal infection is a rare and poorly understood complication of patients with acute myeloid/lymphocytic leukemia (AML/ALL). With the advancements in oncology, patients are living longer in an immunocompromised state and thus bearing the inherent problems such as infections that arise with it. Perianal infection and its management impacts patients' quality of life as well as interrupts their ongoing oncologic treatment. The optimal treatment strategy for perianal infections in this highly immunocompromised group remains unclear, as does the selection and outcomes of patients for operative intervention. The aim of this study is to identify patient characteristics associated with perianal infection and to delineate outcomes in patients that undergo operative intervention. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify hospitalized patients with diagnoses of perianal abscess and AML/ALL between 2007 and 2015. Patient data were weighted to obtain national estimates. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without perianal disease using Rao-Scott Chi-square test for categorical variables, and weighted simple linear regression for continuous variables. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management. Results: There were 12,626 (0.7%) patients with perianal disease among 1,782,778 AML/ALL patient admissions. Patients with perianal disease were more likely to be younger (43.9 (42.5 – 45.3) years, p < 0.001), male (67.4% vs 32.6%, p < 0.001) and white (65.8% vs 54.8%, p < 0.001). Length of stay (18.4 days vs 9 days, p < 0.001) and hospital cost ($54K vs $25K, p < 0.001) were higher in those with perianal disease, but there was no difference in in-hospital mortality (5.5% in those with perianal diseases vs 6.2% in those without, p = 0.150). Greater proportion of patients without perianal disease were discharged to hospice (12.6% patients without perianal disease vs 5.1% patients with perianal disease, p < 0.001). Receiving a surgical intervention did not improve outcomes with respect to in-hospital mortality (5.9% operative vs 5.4 non-operative, p = 0.596), length of stay (20.2 days vs 18.2 days, p = 0.582) or hospital cost ($67K vs $53K, p = 0.525). Conclusions: Perianal disease is a rare but distressing complication in AML/ALL patients associated with longer hospital stays and higher hospital costs. Operative intervention for perianal disease did not reduce rates of in-hospital mortality, length of stay or hospital cost but it does impact the probability of discharge to hospice. Non-operative and operative intervention both remain equivocal in changing the outcomes these patients. Further studies are required to examine these associations and determine best practices for treatment of this condition in this complex patient population.
Trauma Patient Admission to Trauma Surgeons Is Associated with Decreased Length of Stay, Hospital Cost and Patient Complication
