Impact of pharmacist-led shared medication reviews on adherence among polymedicated older patients: an observational retrospective French study

Author(s):  
Gersende Faton ◽  
Pierre-Antoine Drubay ◽  
Geoffroy Vergez ◽  
Sébastien Faure
2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 894-898
Author(s):  
Sharron Duffy ◽  
Ruth Paterson

Frailty in old age has become synonymous with medication use. As people age, the risk of disease burden increases. Older age is often linked with complex healthcare needs, with a rise in the number of comorbidities. This often results in the need to use multiple medications. Frailty is a global concern and requires early interventions to help people maintain their health as they age. Advanced clinical practitioners have an important role in supporting frail people living in the community. This article will review the literature and explore strategies that advanced practitioners can implement to optimise wellbeing and reduce medicines-related harm for this vulnerable population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e216303
Author(s):  
Thomas G. H. Kempen ◽  
Maria Bertilsson ◽  
Nermin Hadziosmanovic ◽  
Karl-Johan Lindner ◽  
Håkan Melhus ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (660) ◽  
pp. e501-e506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jojanneke JGT van Summeren ◽  
Jan Schuling ◽  
Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp ◽  
Petra Denig

BackgroundSeveral methods have been developed to conduct and support medication reviews in older persons with multimorbidity. Assessing the patient’s priorities for achieving specific health outcomes can guide the medication review process. Little is known about the impact of conducting such assessments.AimThis pilot study aimed to determine proposed and observed medication changes when using an outcome prioritisation tool (OPT) during a medication review in general practice.Design and settingParticipants were older patients with multimorbidity (aged ≥69 years) with polypharmacy (five or more chronic medications) from the practices of 14 GPs.MethodPatients were asked to prioritise four universal health outcomes — remaining alive, maintaining independence, reducing pain, and reducing other symptoms — using an OPT. GPs used this prioritisation to review the medication and to propose and discuss medication changes with the patient. The outcomes included the proposed medication change as documented by the GP, and the observed medication change in the electronic health record at follow-up. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine medication changes according to the prioritised health outcomes.ResultsA total of 59 patients using 486 medications prioritised the four health outcomes. GPs proposed 34 changes of medication, mainly stopping, for 20 patients. At follow-up, 14 medication changes were observed for 10 patients. The stopping of medication (mostly preventive) was particularly observed in patients who prioritised ‘reducing other symptoms’ as most important.ConclusionUsing an OPT leads mainly to the stopping of medication. Medication changes appeared to be easiest for patients who prioritised ‘reducing other symptoms’ as most important.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1309-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G.H. Kempen ◽  
Ulrika Gillespie ◽  
Maria Färdborg ◽  
Jennifer McIntosh ◽  
Alpana Mair ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Beuscart ◽  
Ségolène Petit ◽  
Sophie Gautier ◽  
Patrick Wierre ◽  
Thibaut Balcaen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The community pharmacist is a key player in medication reviews of older outpatients. However, it is not always clear which individuals require a medication review. The objective of the present study was to identify high-priority older patients for intervention by a community pharmacist. Methods As part of their final-year placement in a community pharmacy, pharmacy students conducted 10 interviews each with older adults (aged 65 or over) taking at least five medications daily. The student interviewer also offered to examine the patient’s home medicine cabinet. An interview guide was developed by an expert group to assess the difficulties in managing and taking medications encountered by older patients. Results The 141 students interviewed a total of 1370 patients (mean age: 81.5; mean number of medications taken daily: 9.3). Of the 1370 interviews, 743 (54.2%) were performed in the patient’s home, and thus also included an examination of the home medicine cabinet. Adverse events were reported by 566 (42.0%) patients. A total of 378 patients (27.6%) reported difficulties in preparing, administering and/or swallowing medications. The inspections of medicine cabinets identified a variety of shortcomings: poorly located cabinets (in 15.0% of inspections), medication storage problems (21.7%), expired medications (40.7%), potentially inappropriate medications (15.0%), several different generic versions of the same drug (19.9%), and redundant medications (20.4%). Conclusions In a community pharmacy setting, high-priority older patients for intervention by a community pharmacist can be identified by asking simple questions about difficulties in managing, administering, taking or storing medications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document