Crop management and agricultural responses at Early Bronze IV Tell Abu en-Ni'aj, Jordan

2021 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 105435
Author(s):  
Steven Porson ◽  
Steven Falconer ◽  
Suzanne Pilaar Birch ◽  
Elizabeth Ridder ◽  
Patricia Fall
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Herren
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Muir ◽  
J. S. Boyce ◽  
E. C. Seim ◽  
P. N. Mosher ◽  
E. J. Deibert ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-97
Author(s):  
L. E. Schweitzer ◽  
T. W. Semmel

Author(s):  
Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie ◽  
Atsushi Tsunekawa ◽  
Nigussie Haregeweyn ◽  
Enyew Adgo ◽  
Mitsuru Tsubo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 313 ◽  
pp. 107392
Author(s):  
Veronika Hansen ◽  
Jørgen Eriksen ◽  
Lars Stoumann Jensen ◽  
Kristian Thorup-Kristensen ◽  
Jakob Magid
Keyword(s):  

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie ◽  
Atsushi Tsunekawa ◽  
Nigussie Haregeweyn ◽  
Enyew Adgo ◽  
Mitsuru Tsubo ◽  
...  

Teff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and their combinations, on agronomic performance, weed population, lodging, and cost in teff production at the Aba Gerima watershed in northwestern Ethiopia in 2018–2020. Reduced tillage (RT) improved soil moisture, resulting in increased agronomic performance and decreased production costs compared with conventional tillage (CT); however, the weed population was substantially larger with RT than with CT. Row planting (RP) reduced seed cost and lodging but increased sowing and weeding costs compared with broadcast planting (BP). Plant population and leaf area index were substantially greater with BP than with RP during early-stage growth, but this reversed during late-stage growth. Despite labor costs being significantly greater with (WC) compaction than without (NC), little to no differences were observed in the weed population or in agronomic performance. Partial cost–benefit analysis revealed that RT–RP–WC followed by RT–RP–NC was the most economical treatment combination, suggesting that RT–RP–NC could be a labor-effective means of increasing teff production by smallholder farms in Ethiopia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document