The impact of using the Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytology diagnostic criteria on the follicular lesion of undetermined significance category

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Lee ◽  
Brian Smola ◽  
Michael H. Roh ◽  
David T. Hughes ◽  
Barbra S. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Cytomorphologic, Imaging, Molecular Findings, and Outcome in Thyroid Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance/Atypical Cell of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS): A Mini-Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bita Geramizadeh ◽  
Somayeh Bos-hagh ◽  
Zahra Maleki
Keyword(s):  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Atypical Cell ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Ancillary Studies ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objectives: Since the introduction of the entity of “Atypical cell of undetermined significance /follicular lesion of undetermined significance” (AUS/FLUS) by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) in 2007, there have been many published studies about the cytomorphologic criteria, subclassification, outcome, and management of patients with the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. There have been many studies in different aspects of this indeterminate category, i.e., cytologic and molecular findings, ultrasonographic findings, and in some instances even core-needle biopsy to address a better and safer way of the management of patients with this fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis. The second edition of TBSRTC and the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines provide an update on the follow-up and management of AUS/FLUS. A multidisciplinary team consisting of pathologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and radiologists should be involved in the diagnosis and management of AUS/FLUS, and all of them should be aware of the heterogeneity of this lesion for the prediction of the treatment and outcome. Study Design: In this review, we consider different research platforms (2008–2017) to find the best and key reports for the above-mentioned challenging aspects of AUS/FLUS. Conclusion: AUS/FLUS is now a well-defined group of thyroid lesions, which can be most accurately diagnosed and managed with cytomorphology, molecular, and ancillary studies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the positive predictive value of atypical thyroid cytology cases according to the Bethesda system taking histopathology as gold standard.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2015-2020
Author(s):  
Shireen Hamid ◽  
Aman ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Kashif Baig ◽  
Uzma Aslam ◽  
Nausheen Heena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Thyroid Function Tests ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objectives: For the past 20 years Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) has evolved as the most sensitive diagnostic tool for the initial screening of patients with thyroid nodules. Unfortunately FNAC is complicated by a recognized false negative rate of approximately 5%. The clinicians could face the difficulty in the management of patient when a cytological diagnosis is atypical only. The objective of study is to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of atypical thyroid cytology cases according to the Bethesda system taking histopathology as gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Department of Pathology at Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: Six months i.e. from 25.11.2014 to 25.5.2015. Materials and Methods: Patients presenting with solitary thyroid nodules in the outpatient department and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included after evaluation by thyroid function tests and thyroid scan, FNAC was performed and reported according to Bethesda system of thyroid reporting. Later on, cases underwent lobectomy, total or hemi-thyroidectomy, the tissue was received in 10% formalin solution in our pathology department and then processed, stained and examined. FNAC results of atypical cases were then compared with the definitive histological diagnosis which were considered the gold standard. The slides were examined and any differences were sought by consensus of two pathologists. Eighty cases were observed with 95% confidence level, 11% margin of error, using non-probability purposive sampling technique for sample collection. Data was analyzed by SPSS version 15 (P value <0.05). Results: The mean age of patients was 38 years with SD ± 2.16. There were 22 (28%) males and 58 (72%) females in our study. In this study, positive predictive value for Atypia of undetermined significance/ Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), follicular neoplasm (FN), suspicious for malignancy and positive for malignancy were 33.3%, 25%, 66.6% and 100% respectively. Overall PPV of atypical cytology was 35.71%. Overall accuracy of FNAC was 86.30%, 87.50% sensitivity and 86.15% specificity, PPV value 43.75% and negative predictive value was 98.25%. Conclusion: Results showed that Bethesda system of reporting is helpful for the management of patients who falls in to undetermined categories as it categorically divide atypical cytology cases in to three definite categories  AUS, FN and suspicious for malignancy and these categories have different risks of malignancy. Thus can help to determine a better patient outcome due to proper clinical management of thyroid swellings.

scholarly journals The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology: a prospective study in a tertiary care institute along with review of literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3670
Author(s):  
Avni Bhatnagar ◽  
Kavita Mardi ◽  
Shivani Sood ◽  
Vijay Kaushal ◽  
Kanishk Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Malignancy Risk ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Background: The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology (TSBRTC) was devised by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to obtain uniformity, reproducibility and a defined management protocol while dealing with thyroid lesions. This study was undertaken with the aim to see the benefits of adopting TBSRTC in the diagnosis of thyroid FNAC, and identify the malignancy risk of each category.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh from June 2016 to July 2017 on 181 thyroid FNACs which were reported according to the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) under six categories: (I) non-diagnostic/unsatisfactory (II) benign (III) atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (IV) follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (specify if Hurthle cell (oncocytic) type (V) suspicious for malignancy (VI) malignant. Histopathological diagnosis was available for 65 cases where thyroidectomy was performed. Malignancy risk was calculated for each category. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for TBSRCT were also calculated. All the data was analyzed in SPSS software version 22.0 (IBM, USA).Results: Benign lesions constituted the major bulk. After the use of TBSRTC, there was increased ability to look for follicular neoplasms, improvement in making definitive diagnosis of the cases, an improvement in diagnostic accuracy, and we were in line with the implied risk outlined by TBSRTC in most of the cases.Conclusions: Application of TBSRTC results in uniformity in reporting among pathologists and better interdisciplinary communication and patient management.

scholarly journals Reporting Thyroid Cytology in a Globalized World

Endocrines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-319
Author(s):  
Cristina Pizzimenti ◽  
Francesca Mazzeo ◽  
Gaetano Basilio Militi ◽  
Giovanni Tuccari ◽  
Antonio Ieni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reporting System ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Follicular Tumor ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Globalized World ◽  
The Impact

The Italian SIAPEC-AIT 2014 classification, the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC), the 2016 UK Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) thyroid reporting system, and the 2019 Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology (JRSTAC2019) represent the most widely used reporting systems among clinicians and pathologists for the purpose of cytologically diagnosing, estimating the potential risk of malignancy (ROM), and defining the most appropriate treatment for a patient with a thyroid nodule. Although all the systems use overlapping diagnostic categories and morphologic criteria, they differ on the basis of the criteria for inclusion in the cytologic categories, which may, in turn, affect the ROM of a given category and the clinical management of the patient, particularly with regard to the “indeterminate” categories. The aim of this review is to analyze the main differences that emerge between the systems and to propose possible solutions for a comprehensive reporting system that integrates and harmonizes all the criteria of the Italian classification and the Bethesda system, also taking into account the impact that the new tumor entity NIFTP (non-invasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features) that has, in many instances, replaced the non-invasive form of the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma, has had on the modification of malignancy risks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document