scholarly journals Heteropathic versus homopathic resource integration and value co-creation in service ecosystems

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2999-3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda D. Peters
2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2964-2971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaisa Koskela-Huotari ◽  
Bo Edvardsson ◽  
Julia M. Jonas ◽  
David Sörhammar ◽  
Lars Witell

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kotaiba Aal ◽  
Laura Di Pietro ◽  
Bo Edvardsson ◽  
Maria Francesca Renzi ◽  
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to extend the understanding of innovation in service ecosystems by focussing on the role of values resonance in relation to the integration of brands, service systems and experience rooms. Design/methodology/approach – An empirical, explorative case study of an innovative service system is carried out using a narrative approach and presented in the form of a saga. Findings – Insights gleaned from the empirical study are used for conceptual developments. Analysis of the empirical case study is presented as four lessons linked to values, brands, service systems and experience rooms. Originality/value – The paper extends a conceptual framework of innovative resource integration in service ecosystems. The paper also contributes four propositions to inform theory: values resonance is a basis for service innovation, the innovative integration of brands based on values resonance can foster innovation, the integration of resources across service system boundaries grounded in values resonance can enable innovation and the integration of experience rooms into a coherent servicescape based on values resonance can support novel forms of resource integration and value co-creation efforts in service ecosystems.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Caridà ◽  
Bo Edvardsson ◽  
Maria Colurcio

The strong linkage between the creation of value and the actors’ resource-integrating efforts forces academics and practitioners to understand how value stems from resource integration (RI). This article analyses RI as an embedded process within the wider process of interactive value formation. The study is conceptual in nature and adopts a qualitative research approach and an empirical contextualization strategy. It provides a granular perspective on RI and proposes a framework that depicts RI as a process that shapes and results from a complex service context through a sequence of three phases: matching, resourcing and valuing. The article, particularly the suggested new framework, contributes to the extant literature on RI in service research; it reconceptualizes RI as process per se that is embedded in actors’ value co-creation efforts and offers the opportunity to reflect on this process as a fundamental enabler in value-creating service ecosystems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 834-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Baccarani ◽  
Fabio Cassia

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand how the resource integration processes that occur within service ecosystems affect both the well-being of the entire ecosystem and the well-being of specific focal actors (i.e. customers) in the ecosystem. Specifically, this paper considered cases in which customers’ well-being results from simultaneous participation in a multiplicity of service ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach An illustrative example, taken from the tourism context, was used to develop a conceptual framework (of which customers were the focal actors) to evaluate service ecosystem outcomes. Findings The results showed that the well-being of focal actors (i.e. customers) should be evaluated by considering the outcomes that arise in the interlocking service ecosystems in which the customers simultaneously participate. Further, in relation to these interlocking service ecosystems, high levels of well-being within a single ecosystem did not necessarily cause focal actors to experience high levels of well-being. Research limitations/implications To ensure the creation of positive customer experiences, the co-creating actors (e.g. the service providers) must first identify each of the interlocking service ecosystems in which customers simultaneously participate and then establish interactions with other relevant actors. Originality/value By considering the complex relationships between the well-being of a service ecosystem as a whole and the well-being of specific focal actors (e.g. customers) in an ecosystem, this study advances knowledge about evaluations on the performance of service ecosystems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 3-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Viroli ◽  
Danilo Pianini ◽  
Sara Montagna ◽  
Graeme Stevenson ◽  
Franco Zambonelli

2020 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 487-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyush Sharma ◽  
Kokil Jain ◽  
Russel P.J. Kingshott ◽  
Akiko Ueno

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document