4DCT-derived Endocardial Left Ventricular Torsion Correlates With 2D MR Tagging-based Measurements In The Same Subjects

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. S53
Author(s):  
G. Colvert ◽  
J. Ortuño ◽  
M. Chen ◽  
M. Ledesma-Carbayo ◽  
E. McVeigh
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Cheng ◽  
Liuquan Cheng ◽  
Rong Wang ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Changqing Gao

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify left ventricular torsion by newly applied cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT), and to evaluate the clinical value of the ventricular torsion as a sensitive indicator of cardiac function by comparison of preoperative and postoperative torsion.Methods: A total of 54 volunteers and 36 patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) and LV ejection fraction (EF) between 30%-50% were screened preoperatively or postoperatively by MRI. The patients’ short axis views of the whole heart were acquired, and all patients had a scar area >75% in at least one of the anterior or inferior segments. Their apical and basal rotation values were analyzed by feature tracking, and the correlation analysis was performed for the improvement of LV torsion and ejection fraction after CABG. The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of torsion measured by CMR-FT were assessed.Results: In normal hearts, the apex rotated counterclockwise in the systolic period with the peak rotation as 10.2 ± 4.8°, and the base rotated clockwise as the peak value was 7.0 ± 3.3°. There was a timing hiatus between the apex and base untwisting, during which period the heart recoils and its suction sets the stage for the following rapid filling period. The postoperative torsion and rotation significantly improved compared with preoperative ones. However, the traditional indicator of cardiac function, ejection fraction, didn’t show significant improvement.Conclusion: Left ventricular torsion derived from CMR-FT, which does not require specialized CMR sequences, was sensitive to patients with low ejection fraction whose cardiac function significantly improved after CABG. The rapid acquisition of this measurement has potential for the assessment of cardiac function in clinical practice. 


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosakote M Nagaraj ◽  
Thomas S Denney ◽  
Steven G Lloyd ◽  
David Calhoun ◽  
Inmaculada Aban ◽  
...  

Background: Muscle fibers are arranged in a spiral network and are connected by extracellular matrix (ECM). LV torsion is increased in the pressure overloaded heart where there is an increase in ECM. However, torsion and its relation to ECM have not been systematically studied in the volume overloaded heart. Hypothesis: The volume overloaded heart has a decrease in LV torsion due a loss of ECM. Methods: Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) (n=29), resistant hypertension (HTN) (n=77) and normal volunteers (NL) (n±37) were studied. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with tissue tagging was performed and analyzed using three-dimensional data set. Torsion was computed by fitting a B-spline deformation model in prolate-spheroidal coordinates to the tag line data. A subset of MR subjects had LV collagen assessed by picric acid Sirius red from biopsy samples taken at the time of surgery. Results: LV ejection fraction was 65% in MR and 70% in HTN. MR demonstrated eccentric remodeling and HTN demonstrated concentric remodeling. HTN had significantly higher torsion angle and systolic twist compared to NL and MR. This was associated with a simultaneous decrease in longitudinal strain. In contrast, MR patients had similar torsion indices, circumferential and longitudinal strains compared to NL. LV biopsy in MR demonstrated a decrease in interstitial collagen compared to NL. Conclusions: As opposed to the pure volume overloaded heart, LV torsional forces are increased in the pressure overloaded heart. This difference may be related to a rearrangement of the laminar structure due to a differential effect on ECM in the volume overloaded versus the pressure overloaded heart.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seon Mi Jin ◽  
Chung Il Noh ◽  
Eun Jung Bae ◽  
Jung Yun Choi ◽  
Yong Soo Yun

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krunoslav Michael Sveric ◽  
Stefan Ulbrich ◽  
Mohamed Rady ◽  
Tobias Ruf ◽  
Heda Kvakan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  
Rory B. Weiner ◽  
Aaron L. Baggish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document