Foreign direct investment in European transition economies—The role of policies

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri G. Demekas ◽  
Balázs Horváth ◽  
Elina Ribakova ◽  
Yi Wu
2015 ◽  
pp. 543-555
Author(s):  
Natasa Stanojevic ◽  
Slobodan Kotlica

This paper considers the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the transformation and development of post-socialist transition economies, with some particular review of the example of Republic of Serbia. Given the post-socialist countries had a significant deficiency of inner capacities, FDI was considered as the most important means of providing financial capital, technologies, organizational and managerial practices and access to foreign capital markets. Such expectations were supported by the theories of positive contribution of FDI to the economic transformation of transition countries. Over the past decade, transition economies have been the fastest-growing host for FDI, but there are not expected results. FDI has not contributed much to the industrial improvement or to the promotion of competitiveness and exports, and the new empirical evidence even points to negative effect of FDI penetration on domestic market. Considering the great disparity between potential and realized effects of FDI on the economic development of these economies, this paper explores the main sources of failure. The first is the type of FDI, with predominating acquisitions and privatizations along with less sophisticated technology transfers; the second refers to the sectoral distribution, primarily in non-tradable services and goods, which means that FDI contributes only to the market spread of the investors. These features of FDI created the mechanisms of disarticulation of host economies, with a decrease in economic growth as a result.


Author(s):  
Agim Kukeli

Foreign direct investment (FDI thereafter) is very important for economic growth in transition economies. They have major impact in economic development as a source of physical capital, diffusion of technology, improvements in management and marketing techniques, and enhancing institutional setting of these economies toward market oriented. In this paper, an institutional approach to FDI inflow is investigated to identify relevant factors that have shaped and influenced transition economies. The role of institutions in the inflow of FDI in transition economies is estimated empirically by using Seemingly Unrelated Regression Estimation (SURE) technique.


2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. Brooks

AbstractPolitical scientists and economists have long been interested in the role of special interests in the policymaking process. In the past few years, a series of important new books have argued forcefully that the lobbying activities of economic actors have an important influence on the prospects for war and peace. All of these analyses claim that whether economic actors enhance or decrease the likelihood of conflict ultimately depends on the domestic political balance between economic actors who have a strong vested interest in pushing for peace versus those that do not. I advance two contrary arguments. At least among the advanced states, I posit there are no longer any economic actors who will be favorable toward war and who will lobby the government with this preference. All of the identified mechanisms that previously contributed to such lobbying in these states have been swept away with the end of colonialism and the rise of economic globalization. In particular, I show that the current structure of the global economy now makes it feasible for foreign direct investment to serve as an effective substitute for conquest in a way that was not possible in previous eras. My second argument concerns those economic actors in advanced states with a preference for peace. I posit that it has become unnecessary for them to directly lobby the government to avoid war on economic grounds because economic globalization—the accumulation of decisions by economic actors throughout the globe—now has sufficiently clear economic incentives for leaders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document