scholarly journals Heat acclimation improves sweat gland function and lowers sweat sodium concentration in an adult with cystic fibrosis

Author(s):  
Ashley G.B. Willmott ◽  
Robert Holliss ◽  
Zoe Saynor ◽  
Jo Corbett ◽  
Adam J. Causer ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (11) ◽  
pp. 2873-2881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nassim Hamouti ◽  
Juan Del Coso ◽  
Juan F. Ortega ◽  
Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur R. Bartolozzi ◽  
Sandra Fowkes Godek ◽  
Chris Peduzzi ◽  
Jason Kopec ◽  
Richard Burkholder

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Dziedzic ◽  
Megan L. Ross ◽  
Gary J. Slater ◽  
Louise M. Burke

Context:There is interest in including recommendations for the replacement of the sodium lost in sweat in individualized hydration plans for athletes.Purpose:Although the regional absorbent-patch method provides a practical approach to measuring sweat sodium losses in field conditions, there is a need to understand the variability of estimates associated with this technique.Methods:Sweat samples were collected from the forearms, chest, scapula, and thigh of 12 cyclists during 2 standardized cycling time trials in the heat and 2 in temperate conditions. Single measure analysis of sodium concentration was conducted immediately by ion-selective electrodes (ISE). A subset of 30 samples was frozen for reanalysis of sodium concentration using ISE, flame photometry (FP), and conductivity (SC).Results:Sweat samples collected in hot conditions produced higher sweat sodium concentrations than those from the temperate environment (P= .0032). A significant difference (P= .0048) in estimates of sweat sodium concentration was evident when calculated from the forearm average (mean ± 95% CL; 64 ± 12 mmol/L) compared with using a 4-site equation (70 ± 12 mmol/L). There was a high correlation between the values produced using different analytical techniques (r2= .95), but mean values were different between treatments (frozen FP, frozen SC > immediate ISE > frozen ISE;P< .0001).Conclusion:Whole-body sweat sodium concentration estimates differed depending on the number of sites included in the calculation. Environmental testing conditions should be considered in the interpretation of results. The impact of sample freezing and subsequent analytical technique was small but statistically significant. Nevertheless, when undertaken using a standardized protocol, the regional absorbent-patch method appears to be a relatively robust field test.


2012 ◽  
Vol 169 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Martinez ◽  
Douglas Jones ◽  
Daniel Hodge ◽  
Michael J. Buono

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (20) ◽  
pp. 2356-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Barnes ◽  
Melissa L. Anderson ◽  
John R. Stofan ◽  
Kortney J. Dalrymple ◽  
Adam J. Reimel ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Buono ◽  
Sandra Leichliter Martha ◽  
Jay H. Heaney

2009 ◽  
Vol 297 (4) ◽  
pp. R1082-R1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Buono ◽  
Travis R. Numan ◽  
Ryan M. Claros ◽  
Stephanie K. Brodine ◽  
Fred W. Kolkhorst

We investigated whether the eccrine sweat glands must actively produce sweat during heat acclimation if they are to adapt and increase their capacity to sweat. Eight volunteers received intradermal injections of BOTOX, to prevent neural stimulation and sweat production of the sweat glands during heat acclimation, and saline injections as a control in the contralateral forearm. Subjects performed 90 min of moderate-intensity exercise in the heat (35°C, 40% relative humidity) on 10 consecutive days. Heat acclimation decreased end-exercise heart rate (156 ± 22 vs. 138 ± 17 beats/min; P = 0.0001) and rectal temperature (38.2 ± 0.3 vs. 37.9 ± 0.3°C; P = 0.0003) and increased whole body sweat rate (0.70 ± 0.29 vs. 1.06 ± 0.50 l/h; P = 0.030). During heat acclimation, there was no measurable sweating in the BOTOX-treated forearm, but the control forearm sweat rate during exercise increased 40% over the 10 days ( P = 0.040). Peripheral sweat gland function was assessed using pilocarpine iontophoresis before and after heat acclimation. Before heat acclimation, the pilocarpine-induced sweat rate of the control and BOTOX-injected forearms did not differ (0.65 ± 0.20 vs. 0.66 ± 0.22 mg·cm−2·min−1). However, following heat acclimation, the pilocarpine-induced sweat rate in the control arm increased 18% to 0.77 ± 0.21 mg·cm−2·min−1 ( P = 0.021) but decreased 52% to 0.32 ± 0.18 mg·cm−2·min−1 ( P < 0.001) in the BOTOX-treated arm. Using complete chemodenervation of the sweat glands, coupled with direct cholinergic stimulation via pilocarpine iontophoresis, we demonstrated that sweat glands must be active during heat acclimation if they are to adapt and increase their capacity to sweat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document