Non-surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon-Jung Hwang ◽  
Piet E Haers ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
Hermann F Sailer
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
Salwa El-Habbash ◽  
Timothy McSwiney

Condylar resorption (CR) can be categorized into functional and dysfunctional remodelling of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The literature describes dysfunctional remodelling of the TMJ as idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR). Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is a well-documented but poorly understood pathological entity that can occur spontaneously or post-orthognathic surgery. It predominantly affects young women, with other risk factors including Class 2 malocclusion with steep mandibular plane angles. It is distinguished by a decreased condylar head volume and ramus height, progressive mandibular retrusion and an anterior open bite. Its aetiology can be categorized into surgical and non-surgical risk factors. These include hormones, systemic disease, trauma, mechanical load and surgical risk factors, such as magnitude and direction of mandibular movement, type of surgical fixation and length of post-operative maxilla-mandibular fixation. ICR is a diagnosis of exclusion, and identified by a combination of clinical, radiographic and haematological findings. Multiple treatment options have been described in the literature, including medical management, orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, TMJ surgery, TMJ and orthognathic surgery combined, and total joint prosthesis reconstruction. Further research is required to better understand the aetiology of ICR and more long-term, controlled, multicentre clinical studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of CR patients. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Idiopathic condylar resorption has many presentations and potential causes that can greatly impact the decisions and outcomes for orthodontic/orthognathic treatment.


Author(s):  
Soon-Jung Hwang ◽  
Piet E. Haers ◽  
Axel Zimmermann ◽  
Christian Oechslin ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Dralle ◽  
Andreas Machens ◽  
Carsten Sekulla ◽  
Kerstin Lorenz ◽  
Ingo Gastinger ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Maclaran ◽  
Nilesh Agarwal ◽  
Funlayo Odejinmi

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1495-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyou Yang ◽  
Huixian Li ◽  
Jiahao Li ◽  
Huiying Wu ◽  
Chao Hu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. S13 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.E. Turrentine ◽  
H. Wang ◽  
V.B. Simpson ◽  
R.S. Jones

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Bryselbout ◽  
Veronique Promelle ◽  
Florent Pracca ◽  
Solange Milazzo

Introduction: Consecutive exotropia is one of the complications of esotropia surgery. Its prevalence is estimated at 4%–27%. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for consecutive exotropia in the aftermath of surgical treatment of esotropia. Methods: Seventy-four patients examined in our strabismus consultation for a consecutive exotropia from January 2010 to June 2016 were retrospectively included. The age of onset of esotropia, the presence of amblyopia, the age of esotropia surgery and chosen procedure, the refractive errors, the anomalies of ocular motility, the age of onset of the consecutive exotropia and its angle of deviation were reported. Statistical analyses were performed with Student’s test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: Esotropia occurred in 65% of cases before the age of 1 year, was associated with amblyopia in 51%, hyperopia in 55% or anisometropia in 31%. Surgery was performed before the age of 6 years for 55% of the patients and involved for 52% the both medial recti. The angle of deviation of consecutive exotropia was ≤20 prism dioptres (PD) in 39%, 21-40 PD in 39% and ≥ 40 PD in 22%, related to amblyopia (p = 0.028), and to high hypermetropia (p = 0.05). Discussion: Amblyopia and hyperopia were the most important risk factors of consecutive exotropia in our series. Early onset esotropia, stereopsis abnormalities, anisometropia, oblique dysfunction, convergence insufficiency appeared but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Amblyopia is a major risk factor that should be taken into consideration during surgery of an esotropia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gómez-Barrachina ◽  
J.M. Montiel-Company ◽  
V. García-Sanz ◽  
J.M. Almerich-Silla ◽  
V. Paredes-Gallardo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
Tanya Perry ◽  
Kelly Bora ◽  
Adnan Bakar ◽  
David B. Meyer ◽  
Todd Sweberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document