Effects of mandibular setback surgery on upper airway dimensions and their influence on obstructive sleep apnoea – A systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Fernández-Ferrer ◽  
José María Montiel-Company ◽  
Teresa Pinho ◽  
José Manuel Almerich-Silla ◽  
Carlos Bellot-Arcís
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Mandibular Setback ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Mandibular Setback Surgery ◽  
Airway Dimensions

Rhinological interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea – a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (03) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sharma ◽  
J C R Wormald ◽  
J M Fishman ◽  
P Andrews ◽  
B T Kotecha
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Nasal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

AbstractObjectivesObstructive sleep apnoea is a common chronic sleep disorder characterised by collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The nasal airway forms a significant part of the upper airway and any obstruction is thought to have an impact on obstructive sleep apnoea. A systematic review was performed to determine the role of rhinological surgical interventions in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea.MethodsA systematic review of current literature was undertaken; studies were included if they involved comparison of a non-surgical and/or non-rhinological surgical intervention with a rhinological surgical intervention for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea.ResultsSixteen studies met the selection criteria. The pooled data suggest that there are reductions in the apnoea/hypopnea index and respiratory disturbance index following nasal surgery. However, the current body of studies is too heterogeneous for statistically significant meta-analysis to be conducted.ConclusionNasal surgery may have limited benefit for a subset of patients based on current evidence.

scholarly journals Weight loss surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e020876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Dong ◽  
Brian Y Hong ◽  
Ashley M Yu ◽  
John Cathey ◽  
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Weight Loss Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

IntroductionObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is caused by complete or partial obstruction of the upper airway resulting in repeated episodes of interrupted or shallow breaths. OSA is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The prevalence is estimated to range from 3% to 7% in the general population but may be much higher. Several studies show that weight loss or bariatric surgery may have a role in treating OSA. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the safety and efficacy of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of weight loss surgery for adults with OSA and comorbid obesity.Methods and analysisA search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE and two major Chinese biomedical databases will be performed to identify related trials published as of October 2018. This study will include RCTs, comparing different types of weight loss surgery for OSA with obesity or weight loss surgery for OSA with obesity with other upper airway surgeries. The primary outcomes that will be measured are apnoea–hypopnoea index, excess weight loss and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes will include duration of hospital stay, neck circumference, reoperation, waist circumference, body mass index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, overt complications (eg, gastric fistula, bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection), quality of life, quality of sleep and/or functionality. The systematic review will be conducted according to the recommendations as outlined by the Cochrane collaboration.Ethics and disseminationThe systematic review and meta-analysis will include published data available online and thus ethics approval will not be required. The findings will be disseminated and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Review updates will be conducted if there is new evidence that may cause any change in review conclusions. Any changes to the study protocol will be updated in the PROSPERO trial registry accordingly.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017081743.

Upper airway volumetric changes of obstructive sleep apnoea patients treated with oral appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios K Dontsos ◽  
Athina Chatzigianni ◽  
Moschos A Papadopoulos ◽  
Evangelia Nena ◽  
Paschalis Steiropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Oral Appliances ◽  
Volume Increase ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Summary Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder, attributed to the collapse of the pharyngeal walls and the subsequent complete or partial upper airway obstruction. Among different treatment options for OSA, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, and oral appliances (OAs) have been used, with various outcomes and side effects. Objective The aim of this study was to summarize current knowledge in an evidence-based manner regarding the upper airway volume increase of OSA patients while treated with OAs. Search methods Electronic search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, up to May 2020. Selection criteria Studies were selected after the application of predetermined eligibility criteria. Data collection and analysis Mean airway volume differences and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated, using the random effects model. Sensitivity, exploratory, and meta-regression analyses were also implemented. Results Eleven studies filled the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, while 10 of them were suitable for meta-analysis. In total, 291 patients were included, with mean upper airway volume increase of 1.95 cm3 (95% CI, 1.37–2.53; P < 0.001) with Mandibular Advancement Devices in place. In all studies, post-treatment Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) was either <10 events/hour or was reduced by more than 50% from baseline levels. A greater increase of the velopharynx volume was observed, regarding airway compartments. Conclusions Treatment with OAs in OSA may lead to a significant increase of the upper airway volume with a subsequent decrease of AHI. The velopharynx seems to be affected the most from OA therapy.

Volume-pressure properties of the upper airway in normal subjects and patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

Respirology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denan Wu ◽  
Wataru Hida ◽  
Yoshihiro Kikuchi ◽  
Shinichi Okabe ◽  
Hajime Kurosawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Obstructive Sleep
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document