scholarly journals Why do privatized firms pay higher dividends?

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 101493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Goyal ◽  
Shrikant P. Jategaonkar ◽  
Cal B. Muckley
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 97-113
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Rodnguez-Boetsch

This article discusses the privatization of public services in Argentina in light of the severe crisis that afflicted the country between 1999 and 2002. An inadequate regulatory framework and the absence of effective regulatory agencies resulted in the exercise of monopolistic power over public service fees. The emergence of a series of external shocks, starting in 1997 with the SE Asia crisis, weakened the country's external accounts. In the context of a strict fixed exchange rate regime-rising public service fees and overseas obligations contracted by the privatized firms placed growing pressure on the balance of payments. Even though privatized firms were not directly responsible for the four-year recession or the balance of payments crisis, their actions contributed to the onset and prolongation of the difficulties faced by Argentina.


2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (156) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Milic Milovanovic

In this paper power struggle over the control of an insider privatized firm is modeled as a sequential game with perfect information. The endogenous corruption is a consequence of an insider privatization plan, where employees obtain majority of shares. In the post privatization game three players are dominant: managers, employees, and outside owners. Managers are by far the strongest player, with their key position in privatized firms despite their minority ownership stake. Since managers control working conditions of employees-cum-owners, they exercise an unparalleled power. Motivational structure is given for each player. Their ranked lists of goals and fears are necessary in order to specify parameters for the model. The game is modeled in an extensive form, and backward induction suggests a coalition of insiders (managers and employees) against the interests of outsiders. Under stated conditions, the equilibrium strategy results in an endogenous corruption.


1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM L. MEGGINSON ◽  
ROBERT C. NASH ◽  
MATTHIAS VAN RANDENBORGH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document