Acute Kidney Injury Network definition of contrast-induced nephropathy in the critically ill: Incidence and outcome

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 593-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Lakhal ◽  
Stephan Ehrmann ◽  
Anis Chaari ◽  
Jean-Pierre Laissy ◽  
Bernard Régnier ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen Ebadat ◽  
Eric Bui ◽  
Carlos V. R. Brown

Acute renal failure definitions have changed dramatically over the last 5 to 10 years as a result of criteria established through the following consensus statements/organizations: RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End stage renal disease), AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network), and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). In 2002, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative was tasked with the goal of establishing a consensus statement for acute kidney injury (AKI). The first order of business was to provide a standard definition of AKI. Up to this point, literature comparison was challenging as studies lacked uniformity in renal injury definitions. Implementing results into evidence-based clinical practice was difficult. The panel coined the term “acute kidney injury,” encompassing previous terms, such as renal failure and acute tubular necrosis. This new terminology represented a broad range of renal insults, from dehydration to those requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). This review provides an algorithmic approach to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of AKI. Also discussed are special circumstances, including rhabdomyolysis, contrast-induced nephropathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. Tables outline the AKIN criteria, most current KDIGO consensus guidelines for definition of AKI, differential diagnosis of AKI, agents capable of causing AKI, treatment for specific complications associated with AKI, and options for continuous RRT. Figures show the RIFLE classification scheme and KDIGO staging with prevention strategies. This review contains 1 management algorithm, 2 figures, 6 tables, and 85 references. Keywords: Kidney, renal, KDIGO, azotemia, critical, urine, oliguria, creatinine, dialysis


Author(s):  
Eric A. J. Hoste ◽  
John A. Kellum ◽  
Norbert Lameire

The lack of a precise biochemical definition of acute kidney injury (AKI) resulted in at least 35 definitions in the medical literature, which gave rise to a wide variation in reported incidence and clinical significance of AKI, impeded a meaningful comparison of studies.The first part of this chapter describes and discusses different definitions and classification systems of AKI. Patient outcome and the need for renal replacement therapy are directly related to the severity of AKI, an observation that supports the use of a categorical staging system rather than a simple binary descriptor. The severity of AKI is commonly characterized using the relative changes in serum creatinine and urine output. Recently introduced staging systems including the RIFLE classification and the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) use these relatively simple and readily available parameters allowing the assignment of individual patients to different AKI stages. More recently, a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) workgroup developed a consensus-based AKI staging system drawing elements of both RIFLE and AKIN. The potential pitfalls and limitations of the proposed definitions and classifications are briefly described.The second part of the chapter describes the epidemiology of AKI in different clinical settings; the intensive care unit (ICU), the hospitalized population, and the community. The different spectrum of AKI in the emerging countries is discussed and the most important causes and aetiologies of the major clinical types of AKI, prerenal, renal, and post-renal are summarized in table form. Finally the patient survival and renal functional outcome of AKI are briefly discussed


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 2659-2664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Mandelbaum ◽  
Daniel J. Scott ◽  
Joon Lee ◽  
Roger G. Mark ◽  
Atul Malhotra ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
M. Ostermann

The report is devoted to the problem of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. Currently, the clinical definition of AKI is based on the assessment of increasing serum creatinine, but this method has a number of significant drawbacks. Perhaps the use of biomarkers for early detection of renal injury will improve diagnostic results. Up to date, no specific drug therapy for AKI has no available. The therapeutic tactics are based on the assessment of the risk of development AKI in critically ill patient, hemodynamic optimization, revision of drug therapy to exclude nephrotoxic drugs and the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Despite the numerous studies and the presence of multiple researches of AKI, there are many unclear issues related, for example, how to choose tactics of infusion therapy, the use of vasopressor support in patients with AKI, the time of the beginning and the choice of the mode of RRT, the feasibility of combining several technologies of extracorporeal hemocorrection. It is important to define how to improve the short-term prognosis and the long-term consequences of renal dysfunction.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica G Valero ◽  
Zara Cooper

Acute kidney injury is a common disease that affects critically ill patients and increases morbidity and mortality. Even though there have been extensive efforts to prevent this disease, the incidence has steadily increased over the last decade. This could be attributed to better recognition or to overestimation of the disease based on the most recent consensus criteria. Complications of acute kidney injury have a significant effect on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Despite advances in the field, this disease continues to be a challenge, and decreasing the mortality associated with it remains difficult. Plenty of literature has been published about the appropriate definition, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. One of the topics of ongoing discussion deals with the lack of consensus about the exact timing for initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Even though RRT adds more complexity to the treatment, recent publications suggest that early versus late initiation of RRT is related to reduced mortality in critically ill patients. Further high-level studies of this intervention are warranted to standardize treatment. This review contains 5 figures, 7 tables, and 77 references.               Key words: Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), renal biomarkers, replacement therapy, Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE)


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen Ebadat ◽  
Eric Bui ◽  
Carlos V. R. Brown

Acute renal failure definitions have changed dramatically over the last 5 to 10 years as a result of criteria established through the following consensus statements/organizations: RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End stage renal disease), AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network), and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). In 2002, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative was tasked with the goal of establishing a consensus statement for acute kidney injury (AKI). The first order of business was to provide a standard definition of AKI. Up to this point, literature comparison was challenging as studies lacked uniformity in renal injury definitions. Implementing results into evidence-based clinical practice was difficult. The panel coined the term “acute kidney injury,” encompassing previous terms, such as renal failure and acute tubular necrosis. This new terminology represented a broad range of renal insults, from dehydration to those requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). This review provides an algorithmic approach to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of AKI. Also discussed are special circumstances, including rhabdomyolysis, contrast-induced nephropathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. Tables outline the AKIN criteria, most current KDIGO consensus guidelines for definition of AKI, differential diagnosis of AKI, agents capable of causing AKI, treatment for specific complications associated with AKI, and options for continuous RRT. Figures show the RIFLE classification scheme and KDIGO staging with prevention strategies. This review contains 1 management algorithm, 2 figures, 6 tables, and 85 references. Keywords: Kidney, renal, KDIGO, azotemia, critical, urine, oliguria, creatinine, dialysis


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen Ebadat ◽  
Eric Bui ◽  
Carlos V. R. Brown

Acute renal failure definitions have changed dramatically over the last 5 to 10 years as a result of criteria established through the following consensus statements/organizations: RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End stage renal disease), AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network), and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). In 2002, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative was tasked with the goal of establishing a consensus statement for acute kidney injury (AKI). The first order of business was to provide a standard definition of AKI. Up to this point, literature comparison was challenging as studies lacked uniformity in renal injury definitions. Implementing results into evidence-based clinical practice was difficult. The panel coined the term “acute kidney injury,” encompassing previous terms, such as renal failure and acute tubular necrosis. This new terminology represented a broad range of renal insults, from dehydration to those requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). This review provides an algorithmic approach to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of AKI. Also discussed are special circumstances, including rhabdomyolysis, contrast-induced nephropathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. Tables outline the AKIN criteria, most current KDIGO consensus guidelines for definition of AKI, differential diagnosis of AKI, agents capable of causing AKI, treatment for specific complications associated with AKI, and options for continuous RRT. Figures show the RIFLE classification scheme and KDIGO staging with prevention strategies. This review contains 1 management algorithm, 2 figures, 6 tables, and 85 references. Keywords: Kidney, renal, KDIGO, azotemia, critical, urine, oliguria, creatinine, dialysis


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica G Valero ◽  
Zara Cooper

Acute kidney injury is a common disease that affects critically ill patients and increases morbidity and mortality. Even though there have been extensive efforts to prevent this disease, the incidence has steadily increased over the last decade. This could be attributed to better recognition or to overestimation of the disease based on the most recent consensus criteria. Complications of acute kidney injury have a significant effect on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Despite advances in the field, this disease continues to be a challenge, and decreasing the mortality associated with it remains difficult. Plenty of literature has been published about the appropriate definition, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. One of the topics of ongoing discussion deals with the lack of consensus about the exact timing for initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Even though RRT adds more complexity to the treatment, recent publications suggest that early versus late initiation of RRT is related to reduced mortality in critically ill patients. Further high-level studies of this intervention are warranted to standardize treatment. This review contains 5 figures, 7 tables, and 77 references.               Key words: Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), renal biomarkers, replacement therapy, Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE)


Author(s):  
Peter A. McCullough

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI), previously known as contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important complication in the catheterization laboratory. The most commonly used definition in clinical trials was a rise in serum creatinine (Cr) of 44.2mmol/L (0.5mg/dL) or a 25% increase from the baseline value, assessed at 48h after the procedure. In 2007, the Acute Kidney Injury Network proposed the definition to a rise in serum Cr ≥26.5mmol/L (0.3mg/dL) or a 50% rise in Cr with oliguria which is compatible with previous definitions and is a new standard to follow. If there is a sustained reduction in estimated glomerular function (eGFR) from a baseline above 60 to a new baseline below 60mL/min/1.73m2 at 90 days after the procedure, then a definition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Stage 3) would be met as a late outcome of this complication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document