Effect of Treatment Delay, Age, and Stroke Severity on the Effects of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Alteplase for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data from Randomized Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 650
Author(s):  
Graham Ingalsbe
2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (1141) ◽  
pp. 680-685
Author(s):  
Xi Chen ◽  
Yu Shen ◽  
Chengfang Huang ◽  
Yu Geng ◽  
Yunxian Yu

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of alteplase in intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) regarding the different time windows of treatment (<3 hours, 3–4.5 hours, >4.5 hours).MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted from PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. 12 clinical randomised controlled trials with 3402 patients with AIS met the inclusion criteria. The primary, secondary and tertiary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0–1, mortality at 90th day after treatment and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage within 36 hours, respectively. Network meta-analysis and conventional meta-analysis were carried out for calculating odds ratio (OR), the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and the probabilities of being the best.ResultsFor mRS, alteplase regardless of time delay was significantly more effective than placebo (OR 1.33–2.17). However, alteplase used within 3 hours after AIS occurrence (SUCRA=98.3%) was significantly more effective (OR=1.64) than that at 3–4.5 hours (SUCRA=43%) and showed the trend of priority (OR=1.47) compared with that beyond 4.5 hours (SUCRA=58%). For the mortality, compared with placebo (SUCRA=64.7%), alteplase within 3 hours was similar to that of 3–4.5 hours whereas alteplase beyond 4.5 hours (SUCRA=7.3%) showed the trend of significantly increasing 85% mortality. For the tertiary outcome, alteplase within 3 hours (SUCRA=19.0%) was comparable with placebo (SUCRA=99.9%) whereas alteplase beyond 3 hours significantly increased (OR 5.89–6.67) the symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage.ConclusionsAlteplase within 3 hours should be recommended as the best treatment delay for its best efficacy among all the intervention and equivalent safety compared with placebo. Alteplase beyond 3 hours was less effective compared with that within 3 hours and increased the risk of mortality on 3 months as well as symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage at 36 hours. More head-to-head clinical trials are needed to confirm those findings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 925-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
William N Whiteley ◽  
Jonathan Emberson ◽  
Kennedy R Lees ◽  
Lisa Blackwell ◽  
Gregory Albers ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Flaherty ◽  
Michael A De Georgia ◽  
Thomas M Hemmen ◽  
Rainer Kollmar ◽  
Derk W Krieger ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Appleton ◽  
Lisa J. Woodhouse ◽  
Nikola Sprigg ◽  
Joanna M. Wardlaw ◽  
Philip M. Bath

Background: Thrombolysis, with or without thrombectomy, for acute ischaemic stroke is associated with an increased risk of intracranial bleeding. We assessed whether treatment with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a nitric oxide donor, may influence the associated bleeding risk.Methods: We searched for completed randomized controlled trials of GTN vs. no GTN in acute ischaemic stroke with data on reperfusion treatments (thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy). The primary efficacy outcome was functional status as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at day 90; the primary safety outcome was intracranial bleeding. Secondary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and haemorrhagic transformation of infarction. Individual patient data were pooled and meta-analysis performed using ordinal or binary logistic regression with adjustment for trial and prognostic variables both overall and in those randomized within 6 h of symptom onset.Results: Three trials met the eligibility criteria. Of 715 patients with ischaemic stroke who underwent thrombolysis (709, &gt;99%) or thrombectomy (24, 3.4%), 357 (49.9%) received GTN and 358 (50.1%) received no GTN. Overall, there was no difference in the distribution of the mRS at day 90 between GTN vs. no GTN (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72–1.23; p = 0.65); similarly, there was no difference in intracranial hemorrhage rates between treatment groups (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43–1.89; p = 0.77). In those randomized to GTN vs. no GTN within 6 h of symptom onset, there were numerically fewer bleeding events, but these analyses did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions: In ischaemic stroke patients treated predominantly with thrombolysis, transdermal GTN was safe, but did not influence functional outcome at 90 days.


Haematologica ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 980-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bringhen ◽  
M. V. Mateos ◽  
S. Zweegman ◽  
A. Larocca ◽  
A. P. Falcone ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Turc ◽  
Pervinder Bhogal ◽  
Urs Fischer ◽  
Pooja Khatri ◽  
Kyriakos Lobotesis ◽  
...  

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the cornerstone of acute ischaemic stroke management in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The aim of this guideline document is to assist physicians in their clinical decisions with regard to MT. Methods These Guidelines were developed based on the standard operating procedure of the European Stroke Organisation and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. An interdisciplinary working group identified 15 relevant questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote evidence based recommendations. Expert opinion was provided if not enough evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. Results We found high quality evidence to recommend MT plus best medical management (BMM, including intravenous thrombolysis whenever indicated) to improve functional outcome in patients with LVO-related acute ischaemic stroke within 6 hours after symptom onset. We found moderate quality of evidence to recommend MT plus BMM in the 6-24h time window in patients meeting the eligibility criteria of published randomized trials. These guidelines further detail aspects of prehospital management, patient selection based on clinical and imaging characteristics, and treatment modalities. Conclusions MT is the standard of care in patients with LVO-related acute stroke. Appropriate patient selection and timely reperfusion are crucial. Further randomized trials are needed to inform clinical decision making with regard to the mothership and drip-and-ship approaches, anesthaesia modalities during MT, and to determine whether MT is beneficial in patients with low stroke severity or large infarct volume.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document