Corrigendum to ‘Length of stay for 25,791 California patients found incompetent to stand trial’ [Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 51C (2017) 22–26]

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Matthew Renner ◽  
Carol Newark ◽  
Bradley J. Bartos ◽  
Richard McCleary ◽  
Nicholas Scurich
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 734-742
Author(s):  
Charles Broderick ◽  
Allen Azizian ◽  
Katherine Warburton

ObjectiveWe investigated clinical and demographic variables to better understand their relationship to hospital length of stay for patients involuntarily committed to California state psychiatric hospitals under the state’s incompetent to stand trial (IST) statutes. Additionally, we determined the most important variables in the model that influenced patient length of stay.MethodsWe retrospectively studied all patients admitted as IST to California state psychiatric hospitals during the period January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2018 (N = 20 041). Primary diagnosis, total number of violent acts while hospitalized, age at admission, treating hospital, level of functioning at admission, ethnicity, sex, and having had a previous state hospital admission were evaluated using a parametric survival model.ResultsThe analysis showed that the most important variables related to length of stay were (1) diagnosis, (2) number of violent acts while hospitalized, and (3) age of admission. Specifically, longer length of stay was associated with (1) having a diagnosis of schizophrenia or neurocognitive disorder, (2) one or more violent acts, and (3) older age at admission. The other variables studied were also statistically significant, but not as influential in the model.ConclusionsWe found significant relations between length of stay and the variables studied, with the most important variables being (1) diagnosis, (2) number of physically violent acts, and (3) age at admission. These findings emphasize the need for treatments to target cognitive issues in the seriously mentally ill as well as treatment of violence and early identification of violence risk factors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parnian Toofanian Ross ◽  
Claudia B. Padula ◽  
Stephen R. Nitch ◽  
Dominique I. Kinney

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Renner ◽  
Carol Newark ◽  
Bradley J. Bartos ◽  
Richard McCleary ◽  
Nicholas Scurich

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A403-A404
Author(s):  
J HARRISON ◽  
J ROTH ◽  
R COHEN

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document