state psychiatric hospitals
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 734-742
Author(s):  
Charles Broderick ◽  
Allen Azizian ◽  
Katherine Warburton

ObjectiveWe investigated clinical and demographic variables to better understand their relationship to hospital length of stay for patients involuntarily committed to California state psychiatric hospitals under the state’s incompetent to stand trial (IST) statutes. Additionally, we determined the most important variables in the model that influenced patient length of stay.MethodsWe retrospectively studied all patients admitted as IST to California state psychiatric hospitals during the period January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2018 (N = 20 041). Primary diagnosis, total number of violent acts while hospitalized, age at admission, treating hospital, level of functioning at admission, ethnicity, sex, and having had a previous state hospital admission were evaluated using a parametric survival model.ResultsThe analysis showed that the most important variables related to length of stay were (1) diagnosis, (2) number of violent acts while hospitalized, and (3) age of admission. Specifically, longer length of stay was associated with (1) having a diagnosis of schizophrenia or neurocognitive disorder, (2) one or more violent acts, and (3) older age at admission. The other variables studied were also statistically significant, but not as influential in the model.ConclusionsWe found significant relations between length of stay and the variables studied, with the most important variables being (1) diagnosis, (2) number of physically violent acts, and (3) age at admission. These findings emphasize the need for treatments to target cognitive issues in the seriously mentally ill as well as treatment of violence and early identification of violence risk factors.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Wik ◽  
Vera Hollen ◽  
William H. Fisher

Introduction.In recent years mental health officials have reported a rise in the number of forensic patients present within their state psychiatric hospitals and the adverse impacts that these trends had on their hospitals. To date there have been no large-scale national studies conducted to determine if these trends are specific only to a few states or representative of a more global trend. The purpose of this study was to investigate these reported trends and their national prevalence.Methods.The forensic directors of each state behavioral health agency (including the District of Columbia) were sent an Excel spreadsheet that had two components: a questionnaire and data tables with information collected between 1996 and 2014 from the State Profiling System maintained by the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute. They were asked to verify and update these data and respond to the questionnaire.Results.Responses showed a 76% increase nationally in the number of forensic patients in state psychiatric hospitals between 1999 and 2014. The largest increase was for individuals who were court-committed after being found incompetent to stand trial and in need of inpatient restoration services.Discussion.The data reviewed here indicate that increases in forensic referrals to state psychiatric hospitals, while not uniform across all states, are nonetheless substantial.Conclusion.More research is needed to determine whether this multi-state trend is merely a coincidence of differing local factors occurring in many states, or a product of larger systemic factors affecting mental health agencies and the courts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 536-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Black Smith ◽  
James T. Zoller ◽  
Glen T. Schumock ◽  
Ann L. Richards

Author(s):  
Mary Barber ◽  
Flavio Casoy ◽  
Rachel Zinns

State hospitals have represented an increasingly small piece of the public mental health system due to deinstitutionalization and ongoing hospital downsizing and closure. However, state hospitals continue to treat people with the most serious and complex mental illnesses. Freedom from the need to produce revenue and the luxury of time are two factors that leave state hospitals vulnerable to cuts but are also clinical assets. In this chapter, two cases illustrating histories common to patients treated in the state hospital are discussed—a patient with complex trauma and a patient with schizophrenia—exploring how state hospital systems can be designed to support individuals in their pursuit of recovery.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffry R. Nurenberg ◽  
Steven J. Schleifer ◽  
Cheryl Kennedy ◽  
Mary O. Walker ◽  
David Mayerhoff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document