Internal Bracing Augmentation for Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 985.e1-985.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il-Jung Park ◽  
Mauro Maniglio ◽  
Steven S. Shin ◽  
Dohyung Lim ◽  
Michelle H. McGarry ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1482
Author(s):  
Il-Jung Park ◽  
Dohyung Lim ◽  
Mauro Maniglio ◽  
Steven S. Shin ◽  
Seungbum Chae ◽  
...  

Internal bracing (IB) is an augmentation method using high-strength nonabsorbable tape. However, there is no detailed information about the direction, location, or number of IBs required for scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury repair. Thus, this study compared the biomechanical characteristics of short-transverse IB, long-oblique IB, and the combination of short-transverse and long-oblique (Combo) IB for SLIL injury in a biomechanical cadaveric model. We prepared nine fresh-frozen full upper extremity cadaveric specimens for this study. The scapholunate distance, scapholunate angle, and radioscaphoid angle were measured using the MicroScribe digitizing system with the SLIL intact, after scapholunate dissociation and the three different reconstructions. Three-dimensional digital records were obtained in six wrist positions in each experimental condition. Short-transverse IB had a similar effect compared with long-oblique IB in addressing the widening of the scapholunate distance. However, both were less effective than Combo IB. For scaphoid flexion deformity, short-transverse IB had minimal effect, while long-oblique IB had a similar effect compared to Combo IB. Combo IB was the most effective for improving distraction intensity and rotational strength. This study provides important information about the biomechanical characteristics of three different IB methods for SLIL injury and may be useful to clinicians in treating scapholunate dissociation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gil Thompson ◽  
Joel A. Dustin ◽  
D. Keith Roper ◽  
Steven M. Kane ◽  
Gary M. Lourie

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 615-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian S Fraser ◽  
Jamie E Pichora ◽  
Louis M Ferreira ◽  
Jamie R Brownhill ◽  
James A Johnson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110329
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Wu ◽  
Jamie L. Kator ◽  
Michael Zarro ◽  
Natalie L. Leong

Context: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is among the most common orthopaedic injuries, and reconstruction of a ruptured ACL is a common orthopaedic procedure. In general, surgical intervention is necessary to restore stability to the injured knee, and to prevent meniscal damage. Along with surgery, intense postoperative physical therapy is needed to restore function to the injured extremity. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been the standard of care in recent decades, and advances in surgical technology have reintroduced the prospect of augmented primary repair of the native ACL via a variety of methods. Evidence Acquisition: A search of PubMed database of articles and reviews available in English was performed through 2020. The search terms ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament repair, bridge enhanced acl repair, suture anchor repair, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal bracing, suture ligament augmentation, and internal brace ligament augmentation were used. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: No exact consensus exists on effective rehabilitation protocols after ACL repair techniques, as the variation in published protocols seem even greater than the variation in those for ACLR. For some techniques such as internal bracing and dynamic interligamentary stabilization, it is likely permissible for the patients to progress to full weightbearing and discontinue bracing sooner. However, caution should be applied with regard to earlier return to sport than after ACLR as to minimize risk for retear. Conclusion: More research is needed to address how physical therapies must adapt to these innovative repair techniques. Until that is accomplished, we recommend that physical therapists understand the differences among the various ACL surgery techniques discussed here and work with the surgeons to develop a rehabilitation protocol for their mutual patients. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): C.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Ellwein ◽  
Helmut Lill ◽  
Tomas Smith ◽  
Rony-Orijit DeyHazra ◽  
Mara Warnhoff ◽  
...  

AbstractInternal bracing is an augmentation of ligament repair or reconstruction using a non-absorbable suture tape. The suture reinforcement of the ligament is intended to absorb the forces applied to the joint while the ligament repair or reconstruction underneath is healing. The rigidity of the construct is expected to improve primary stability, which should facilitate and accelerate postoperative mobilization and rehabilitation. Nevertheless, internal bracing is a novel treatment and data is limited. Therefore, this review describes the surgical techniques and provides an overview of the current literature regarding acute and chronic instabilities of the medial and lateral elbow treated with internal bracing.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 732-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Berschback ◽  
David M. Kalainov ◽  
Michael S. Bednar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document