Dorsal Bridge Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Austin B. Fares ◽  
Benjamin R. Childs ◽  
Michael M. Polmear ◽  
DesRaj M. Clark ◽  
Leon J. Nesti ◽  
...  
Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Truong ◽  
Chris Doherty ◽  
Nina Suh

Background: Socioeconomic factors are known to affect outcomes for both medical and surgical conditions. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the current evidence regarding the effect of socioeconomic factors such as income, geographic location, educational level, and occupation on clinical outcomes after distal radius fractures. Methods: A systematic search strategy was performed to identify studies commenting on the effect of socioeconomic factors on clinical outcomes following open or closed distal radius fracture repair. Abstract and full-text screening was performed by 2 independent reviewers, and articles were evaluated by Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES). Treatment outcomes of interest included, but were not limited to, pain, function, range of motion, and grip strength. Results: There were 1745 studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria for abstract screening. Of these, 48 studies met our inclusion criteria for full-text screening and 20 studies met our criteria for quality analysis with the SEQES score. There were 3 studies of high quality, 16 of moderate quality, and 1 of low quality. Meta-analyses were not possible due to the variability in outcomes of interest across papers. Conclusions: Patient factors indicative of socioeconomic status are relevant predictors of functional outcome after distal radius fractures. There is currently limited evidence in this area of research, and further examination should be considered to improve outcomes from a patient and system standpoint.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. S8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Kooner ◽  
Rajeshwar S. Sidhu ◽  
Joy MacDermid ◽  
Ruby Grewal

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 824-835.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael J. Diaz-Garcia ◽  
Takashi Oda ◽  
Melissa J. Shauver ◽  
Kevin C. Chung

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1251-1255
Author(s):  
Stefano Artiaco ◽  
Federico Fusini ◽  
Gioacchino Pennacchio ◽  
Giulia Colzani ◽  
Bruno Battiston ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e039591
Author(s):  
Malou E Slichter ◽  
Gerald A Kraan ◽  
Wichor M Bramer ◽  
Joost W Colaris ◽  
Nina M C Mathijssen

IntroductionTreatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) aims to restore anatomic position of the fracture fragments and congruity of the articular surface to optimise functional outcomes and prevent osteoarthritis in the long term. While ligament injury of the wrist is often associated with DRFs and sole ligament injuries of the wrist lead to osteoarthritis, it is plausible that concomitant ligament injury in DRFs may aggravate degenerative changes of the wrist. The relationship between concomitant ligament injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis in patients with DRFs is unclear. This study aims to identify the types of associated ligament injury in patients with a DRF and to elucidate the association of ligament injury on the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.Methods and analysisThis protocol is written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. An electronic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Trials and Google Scholar has been created and performed by a Health Sciences librarian with expertise in systematic review searching. Original research articles in English literature, which report on concomitant ligament injury of the wrist in relation to post-traumatic osteoarthritis, patient-reported outcome measures or clinician-reported outcome measures in patients (aged ≥18 years) with DRFs will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen and appraise articles and perform data extraction. In case of any disagreements, a third reviewer will be consulted. A systematic qualitative synthesis will be performed using text and tables.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval is required, since this is a protocol for a systematic review. The systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and for presentation at relevant conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020165007.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document