Financial recovery strategies for restaurants during COVID-19: Evidence from the US restaurant industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 408-412
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Yost ◽  
Murat Kizildag ◽  
Jorge Ridderstaat
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwanglim Seo ◽  
Jungtae Soh ◽  
Amit Sharma

This study investigates whether industry-specific characteristics such as franchising can affect investment and financing decisions when restaurant firms have limited access to capital. Building on the resource scarcity theory and investment-cash flow sensitivity (ICFS) model, this study developed an industry-specific ICFS model that analyzes corporate demand for franchising as a means of complementing the firms’ ability to invest in imperfect markets. Using a sample of US restaurant firms, we empirically evaluated the extent to which franchising provides greater insights into ICFS. By investigating the industry-specific effect of franchising on ICFS, the current study provides a more comprehensive understanding and explanation for the interaction between investment and financing decisions in the US restaurant industry. The findings of this study will provide restaurant investors and shareholders with valuable insights into how to monitor the investment behavior of management.


1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Gon Kim

This paper presents an empirical analysis of an important element of capital structure of the restaurant industry which is represented by SIC code 58, eating and drinking places. The study focuses on explaining important characteristics affecting the capital structure of US restaurant firms. This is a cross-sectional analysis which assesses the role of size, earning volatility, profitability, growth opportunities, asset structure, non-debt tax shields, franchising, and leasing expense on various leverage ratios.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 562-568
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Montgomery ◽  
Nikhil R. Yedulla ◽  
Dylan Koolmees ◽  
Eric Battista ◽  
Theodore W. Parsons III ◽  
...  

Aims COVID-19-related patient care delays have resulted in an unprecedented patient care backlog in the field of orthopaedics. The objective of this study is to examine orthopaedic provider preferences regarding the patient care backlog and financial recovery initiatives in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods An orthopaedic research consortium at a multi-hospital tertiary care academic medical system developed a three-part survey examining provider perspectives on strategies to expand orthopaedic patient care and financial recovery. Section 1 asked for preferences regarding extending clinic hours, section 2 assessed surgeon opinions on expanding surgical opportunities, and section 3 questioned preferred strategies for departmental financial recovery. The survey was sent to the institution’s surgical and nonoperative orthopaedic providers. Results In all, 73 of 75 operative (n = 55) and nonoperative (n = 18) providers responded to the survey. A total of 92% of orthopaedic providers (n = 67) were willing to extend clinic hours. Most providers preferred extending clinic schedule until 6pm on weekdays. When asked about extending surgical block hours, 96% of the surgeons (n = 53) were willing to extend operating room (OR) block times. Most surgeons preferred block times to be extended until 7pm (63.6%, n = 35). A majority of surgeons (53%, n = 29) believe that over 50% of their surgical cases could be performed at an ambulatory surgery centre (ASC). Of the strategies to address departmental financial deficits, 85% of providers (n = 72) were willing to work extra hours without a pay cut. Conclusion Most orthopaedic providers are willing to help with patient care backlogs and revenue recovery by working extended hours instead of having their pay reduced. These findings provide insights that can be incorporated into COVID-19 recovery strategies. Level of Evidence: III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):562–568.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Y. Park ◽  
Sang Hyuck Kim

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Gon Kim ◽  
Bill Ryan ◽  
Silvio Ceschini

2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Haley-Lock ◽  
Stephanie Ewert

The US approach to employment regulation has created conditions in which ‘high road’ employee management practices can be costly for employers, while limited regulation gives firms ample freedom to pursue ‘low road’ strategies. Within this context, US firms face increasing domestic and global pressures to cut labor costs of all types, particularly businesses operating in the retail service industry with many low-skilled, hourly jobs. Yet as recent organization- and job-level studies document, not all such jobs are created equal. This article considers potentially different business strategies applied to the same job, that of restaurant waiter, within the distinct public policy contexts of two US states. The authors analyze practices related to waitstaff wages, benefits, and staffing and scheduling reported by managers at 16 sites of two national restaurant chains positioned in different lower-end segments of the full-service restaurant industry; and in suburban Seattle and Chicago, reflecting divergent state minimum-wage policy approaches. Findings reveal variation in employer practices across sites, often patterned by chain and state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document