scholarly journals CD4+ T-cell epitope prediction using antigen processing constraints

2016 ◽  
Vol 432 ◽  
pp. 72-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramgopal R. Mettu ◽  
Tysheena Charles ◽  
Samuel J. Landry
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tysheena Charles ◽  
Daniel L. Moss ◽  
Pawan Bhat ◽  
Peyton W. Moore ◽  
Nicholas A. Kummer ◽  
...  

AbstractAntigen processing in the class II MHC pathway depends on conventional proteolytic enzymes, potentially acting on antigens in native-like conformational states. CD4+ epitope dominance arises from a competition between antigen folding, proteolysis, and MHCII binding. Protease-sensitive sites, linear antibody epitopes, and CD4+ T-cell epitopes were mapped in the plague vaccine candidate F1-V to evaluate the various contributions to CD4+ epitope dominance. Using X-ray crystal structures, antigen processing likelihood (APL) predicts CD4+ epitopes with significant accuracy without considering peptide-MHCII binding affinity. The profiles of conformational flexibility derived from the X-ray crystal structures of the F1-V proteins, Caf1 and LcrV, were similar to the biochemical profiles of linear antibody epitope reactivity and protease-sensitivity, suggesting that the role of structure in proteolysis was captured by the analysis of the crystal structures. The patterns of CD4+ T-cell epitope dominance in C57BL/6, CBA, and BALB/c mice were compared to epitope predictions based on APL, peptide binding to MHCII proteins, or both. For a sample of 13 diverse antigens larger than 200 residues, accuracy of epitope prediction by the combination of APL and I-Ab-MHCII-peptide affinity approached 40%. When MHCII allele specificity is also diverse, such as in human immunity, prediction of dominant epitopes by APL alone approached 40%. Since dominant CD4+ epitopes tend to occur in conformationally stable antigen domains, crystal structures typically are available for analysis by APL; and thus, the requirement for a crystal structure is not a severe limitation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. S4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren R Flower ◽  
Kanchan Phadwal ◽  
Isabel K Macdonald ◽  
Peter V Coveney ◽  
Matthew N Davies ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myong-Hee Sung ◽  
Yingdong Zhao ◽  
Roland Martin ◽  
Richard Simon

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e1000327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan MacNamara ◽  
Ulrich Kadolsky ◽  
Charles R. M. Bangham ◽  
Becca Asquith

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. S3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Lundegaard ◽  
Ilka Hoof ◽  
Ole Lund ◽  
Morten Nielsen

2021 ◽  
pp. 100122
Author(s):  
Brian Reardon ◽  
Zeynep Koşaloğlu-Yalçın ◽  
Sinu Paul ◽  
Bjoern Peters ◽  
Alessandro Sette

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document