Vaccination against HPV-16 Oncoproteins in Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Corson
2009 ◽  
Vol 361 (19) ◽  
pp. 1838-1847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma G. Kenter ◽  
Marij J.P. Welters ◽  
A. Rob P.M. Valentijn ◽  
Margriet J.G. Lowik ◽  
Dorien M.A. Berends-van der Meer ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 821-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith MG van Esch ◽  
Marij JP Welters ◽  
Ekaterina S Jordanova ◽  
J Baptist MZ Trimbos ◽  
Sjoerd H van der Burg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e002547
Author(s):  
Noor Alida Maria Bakker ◽  
Jossie Rotman ◽  
Marc van Beurden ◽  
Henry J MAA Zijlmans ◽  
Maartje van Ruiten ◽  
...  

BackgroundUsual vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN) is a premalignancy caused by persistent infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), mainly type 16. Even though different treatment modalities are available (eg, surgical excision, laser evaporation or topical application of imiquimod), these treatments can be mutilating, patients often have recurrences and 2%–8% of patients develop vulvar carcinoma. Therefore, immunotherapeutic strategies targeting the pivotal oncogenic HPV proteins E6 and E7 are being explored to repress carcinogenesis.MethodIn this phase I/II clinical trial, 14 patients with HPV16+ uVIN were treated with a genetically enhanced DNA vaccine targeting E6 and E7. Safety, clinical responses and immunogenicity were assessed. Patients received four intradermal HPV-16 E6/E7 DNA tattoo vaccinations, with a 2-week interval, alternating between both upper legs. Biopsies of the uVIN lesions were taken at screening and +3 months after last vaccination. Digital photography of the vulva was performed at every check-up until 12 months of follow-up for measurement of the lesions. HPV16-specific T-cell responses were measured in blood over time in ex vivo reactivity assays.ResultsVaccinations were well tolerated, although one grade 3 suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction was observed. Clinical responses were observed in 6/14 (43%) patients, with 2 complete responses and 4 partial responses (PR). 5/14 patients showed HPV-specific T-cell responses in blood, measured in ex vivo reactivity assays. Notably, all five patients with HPV-specific T-cell responses had a clinical response.ConclusionsOur results indicate that HPV-16 E6/E7 DNA tattoo vaccination is a biologically active and safe treatment strategy in patients with uVIN, and suggest that T-cell reactivity against the HPV oncogenes is associated with clinical benefit.Trial registration numberNTR4607.


Sexual Health ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Tan ◽  
Suzanne M. Garland ◽  
Alice R. Rumbold ◽  
Ibrahim Zardawi ◽  
Debbie Taylor-Thomson ◽  
...  

Background A high incidence of vulvar cancer, and its precursor lesion, high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) has been identified in young Indigenous women living in the Arnhem Land region of the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. This clustering is restricted to women aged <50 years, suggesting that oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a key causal factor. This study compared the HPV genotype prevalence, HPV-16 variant distribution and p16INK4aexpression in stored vulvar cancer and high-grade VIN biopsy specimens from women residing in Arnhem Land, with specimens taken from Indigenous and non-Indigenous women in other regions of NT where there is no observed increase in vulvar cancer incidence. Methods: Twenty high-grade VIN and 10 invasive cancer biopsies were assessed from Arnhem Land along with 24 high-grade VIN and 10 invasive cancer biopsies from other regions of NT. Results: Biopsies from Arnhem Land were similar to those from other regions in the detection of high-risk (HR) or possible HR HPV (VIN: 95% and 84% respectively for Arnhem Land and other regions, P = 0.356; invasive cancer: 100% and 80%, P = 0.473), HPV-16 (VIN: 60% and 80%, P = 0.364; invasive cancer: 70% and 70%, P = 1.0) and p16INK4a expression (VIN: 90% and 84%, P = 0.673; invasive cancer: 100% and 80%, P = 0.474). All HPV-16 variants were of the European prototype. Conclusion: Comparison of biopsies revealed no significant difference in the frequency of oncogenic HPVs or HPV-16 variant types between Arnhem Land and other regions, suggesting another cofactor in this cluster.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document